Natural News Store

Showing posts with label central bankers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label central bankers. Show all posts

Monday, July 11, 2011

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892

"This [Federal Reserve] Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized, the people may not know it immediately but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."... "The financial system [...] has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That board administers the finance system by authority of [...] a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money." ~ Charles August Lindbergh Sr.

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892

Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens. He also opposed both American entry into World War I, and the 1913 Federal Reserve Act.

"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.

The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."

Source

Carnegie, the Rockefellers, the late Jay Gould, E.H. Harriman and J.P.Morgan, and most of those who have individually amassed wealth by the hundreds of millions, began with little or nothing in the way of capital, except their ability, and the system which permitted their enormous accumulations. As I have already said, it is the system that deprives the plain people of the profits resulting from their work, and gives it to the class of men mentioned. It ought to be of comparatively little satisfaction to this generation to let the system remain unaltered and calmly sit back and allow these enormous fortunes to be accumulated. It is undoubtedly true that the present possessors, if the laws of devise and inheritance were abolished, would dispose of most of it as they wished while still living, but there would be a new set on hand to rob our children.

The only excuse for government is the facility it affords its citizens for securing advantages that operate for the common welfare, which could not be secured with the same degree of equability through independent individual action.

Instead of that, our government, which is of our own creation, has insured to the banks and other trusts a system which renders it easy for them to oppress the masses. It enables the few to live as non-producers and exorbitant spenders, while almost the entire burden falls on the rest of us. Such a condition is impossible of long tolerance by the proud, honest and intelligent citizens of our country. We must seek for a remedy.

Banking and Currency and The Money Trust, Charles A. Lindbergh, 1913, PP.158-160

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Iceland Declares Independence from International Banks

Iceland is free. And it will remain so, so long as her people wish to remain autonomous of the foreign domination of her would-be masters — in this case, international bankers.

On April 9, the fiercely independent people of island-nation defeated a referendum that would have bailed out the UK and the Netherlands who had covered the deposits of British and Dutch investors who had lost funds in Icesave bank in 2008.

At the time of the bank’s failure, Iceland refused to cover the losses. But the UK and Netherlands nonetheless have demanded that Iceland repay them for the “loan” as a condition for admission into the European Union.

In response, the Icelandic people have told Europe to go pound sand. The final vote was 103,207 to 69,462, or 58.9 percent to 39.7 percent. “Taxpayers should not be responsible for paying the debts of a private institution,” said Sigriur Andersen, a spokeswoman for the Advice group that opposed the bailout.

A similar referendum in 2009 on the issue, although with harsher terms, found 93.2 percent of the Icelandic electorate rejecting a proposal to guarantee the deposits of foreign investors who had funds in the Icelandic bank. The referendum was invoked when President Olafur Ragnur Grimmson vetoed legislation the Althingi, Iceland’s parliament, had passed to pay back the British and Dutch.

Under the terms of the agreement, Iceland would have had to pay £2.35 billion to the UK, and €1.32 billion to the Netherlands by 2046 at a 3 percent interest rate. Its rejection for the second time by Iceland is a testament to its people, who feel they should bear no responsibility for the losses of foreigners endured in the financial crisis.

That opposition to bailouts led to Iceland’s decision to allow the bank to fail in 2008. Not that the taxpayers there could have afforded to. As noted by Bloomberg News, at the time the crisis hit in 2008, “the banks had debts equal to 10 times Iceland’s $12 billion GDP.”

“These were private banks and we didn’t pump money into them in order to keep them going; the state did not shoulder the responsibility of the failed private banks,” Iceland President Olafur Grimsson told Bloomberg Television.

The voters’ rejection came despite threats to isolate Iceland from funding in international financial institutions. Iceland’s national debt has already been downgraded by credit rating agencies, and now those same agencies have promised to do so once again as punishment for defying the will of international bankers.

Read complete article...Iceland Declares Independence from International Banks

Saturday, August 22, 2009

UPDATE! U.S. Regional, Community Banking, Credit Unions Under Attack By Intl Banking Industry Controlled FDIC, and selling to foreign banks?


Am I the only one who has noticed the relationship between FDIC bank closings being mostly regional, community banks, and credit unions? 

The latest being a large community bank from Austin, TX Guaranty Bank, Colonial state chartered bank from Alabama, and Community Bank of Nevada, along with other local Nevada banks and credit unions.

Doing a bit of research, I found this Boston Business Journal report from March of this year stating that the FDIC slapped East Bridgewater Savings, a bank having NO bad loans, with a rare “needs to improve” rating after evaluating the community bank under the Community Reinvestment Act, saying they "were not lending enough".  In essence, punishing them for smart and cautious lending practices.

So, by using heavy handed tactics, it appears as though the the FDIC is forcing these smaller banks and credit unions into risky practices in order to drive them out of business, while  at the same time the major banking industry players tighten their own  purse strings.

Looking over the FDIC failed bank list, it's hard to overlook the fact that this looks to be nothing more than a systematic takeover of small banking  (Savings and loan, State, Community, credit union, etc.) by the major international banking industry using the power of the FDIC. 

The regulators are nothing more than industry foxes guarding the henhouse.

Elaine Nichols is a Home Educator, Activist, Organizer, Political Consultant, Political Advisor, Publicist and Researcher.  Her blog can be found at  http://thewhiteroseresistance.blogspot.com/ 

UPDATE: 

U.S. Government Banking Regulators Helps Spanish Company to Buy Texas Bank!!
Published: August 21, 2009

Guaranty Bank, a deeply troubled Texas lender, was sold on Friday toBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria of Spain in one of the largest government-assisted deals offered to a foreign firm.

Federal regulators seized Guaranty Bank and simultaneously brokered the sale of its branches as well as most of the deposits and assets to BBVA Compass, the Spanish bank’s American subsidiary. The government, however, agreed to absorb most of the losses on $9.7 billion, or more than 80 percent, of the Guaranty assets included in the deal.

The failure is the fourth-largest since the financial crisis began, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationprojects that it will cost its deposit insurance fund about $3 billion.

Regulators also arranged for the sales of three smaller banks in Alabama and Georgia on Friday, bringing the total number of bank failures so far this year to 81. That compares with only 25 bank failures in all of 2008.
News that BBVA had submitted the winning bid leaked out earlier this week, but regulators waited until late Friday to orchestrate the takeover. That may be another sign that confidence in the financial system is being restored, since in contrast to past leaks, regulators did not immediately seize the bank over fears of rumors stoking a bank run.

Stockholders in Guaranty Bank will be wiped out, but the deal ensures that its depositors will not suffer losses. Although BBVA did not take control of the failed bank’s $344 million of brokered deposits, the F.D.I.C. said that it would reimburse brokers directly for those funds.

The government also agreed to shoulder the bulk of the losses on all of Guaranty’s loans — a deal sweetener that the government has rarely extended to overseas buyers.

BBVA agreed to buy $12 billion of the $13 billion assets left at Guaranty Bank, which it will ultimately sell to private investors. The F.D.I.C. agreed to take on the remaining $1 billion of assets, as well as cover losses on the $9.7 billion pool of risky loans that BBVA bought. The agreement calls for the government to take on about 80 percent of the first $2.3 billion of losses, and 95 percent of the losses above that threshold.

Loss-sharing agreements have become a standard part of the F.D.I.C.’s toolkit for resolving troubled banks, but rarely have they covered such a big portion of a failed bank’s assets.

And seldom are they offered to foreign buyers. Indeed, it appears the last time that an overseas bank received federal assistance in a failed bank deal was when the Bank of Ireland scooped up four New Hampshire banks in September 1991.

Analysts say the BBVA deal may signal that the F.D.I.C. will be more open to bids from foreign banks. Many of the strongest American banks are occupied with deals they did last fall, while private equity firms have struggled to meet the high bar set by regulators. Weaker banks, meanwhile, have been hamstrung by their own losses. That has left regulators scrambling to drum up buyers.

José Maria Garcia Meyer, the head of BBVA’s American operations, said in a statement that the deal provided convincing evidence of the bank’s strength and stability during the current crisis. “This transaction further demonstrates BBVA’s clear commitment in building its U.S. franchise,” he added.

Along with its Spanish rival Banco Santander, BBVA has been ramping up its business in fast-growing American markets that have strong ties to Latin America. It made a series of expensive acquisitions in Texas over the last few years.

Guaranty, which is based in Austin, will add another 103 locations in Texas and 59 branches in California, where BBVA has been trying to establish a beachhead. That will give it a total of 767 locations in seven Sun Belt states and make it the nation’s 15th-largest commercial bank with about $49 billion in deposits.

In 2005, BBVA Group acquired Laredo National Bank, based in Laredo, Texas. In 2006, it acquired Texas Regional Bancshares of McAllen, Texas, and State National Bancshares to become the fourth biggest bank of Texas after Wells FargoBank of America and JPMorgan Chase.
On February 16, 2007, BBVA announced a definitive agreement to acquire Compass Bancshares Inc. based in BirminghamAlabama. BBVA plans to create the biggest bank in the Sun Belt by consolidating all those banks to create BBVA Compass.[2]

Monday, July 20, 2009

6 Institutions That Don't Want You to Own Gold

By Alex Koyfman
Wednesday, July 15th, 2009
The most powerful financial and political institutions in the world have their sights set on destruction with one target in mind. . .
Gold.
Why? Because, simply put, these Goliaths have a great deal to lose. You might call it Gold's Great Suppression.
You see, their best chance to stay at the helm of power relies on your continued faith in the value of the US dollar.
To pull off this trick, they must divert your attention away from the one asset that holds true inherent value — gold.
They use lies and deceit to depict gold as an archaic investment and label gold investors as "paranoid extremists."
Gold is now the target of a global smear campaign, orchestrated by some of the most influential organizations in power today. In this two-part special report, we'll take a look at six major institutions that don't want you to own gold... and discuss the reasons why.
Gold Suppression Institution #1: Investment Banks
20090714_jp_morgan_headquarters.jpg
JP Morgan Chase Headquarters in New York

Investment banks profit from commissions on issuing and selling equity and debt securities in the capital markets. So, they naturally have a vested interest in steering investment money away from physical gold ownership and toward the securities they sell.
Sure, an investment bank may recommend buying a gold ETF or some other gold-related paper investment, but that's only because they'll get a percent of the trade. Your broker will never tell you to pull your investment capital out of stocks and put it into physical gold.
Truth is, investment banks and brokerage firms are like casinos. It doesn't matter whether you make money in the market or lose it, the house always wins. So, at the end of the day, there is little incentive to provide sound advice — just as long as you continue to trade on it.
There is nothing scarier to firms like JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley than a mad rush of investment in physical gold. Every dollar used to invest in gold is a dollar not used to invest in securities, with commissions lost every step of the way. But to you, the private investor in a time of economic crisis, this is a direct conflict of interest that cannot be ignored.
Gold Suppression Institution #2: The United States Government
20090714_white_house_front.jpg
Front of the White House 

When investors return to owning gold as a store of value, they literally take sides in a war of doctrines — the US government's backing the dollar's value is on one side, and the undeniable value of gold is on the other.
Every time somebody buys gold, the dollar feels it. This may not be a direct causative link, but it may as well be. Since the dollar was taken off the gold standard, our paper currency forever lost the true source of its strength: the inherent value carried by gold and silver.
The US federal government lives and breathes by the dollar. With inflation corroding the greenback at an unprecedented rate, the last thing they want is their citizens' defecting back to gold. For you, however, it's a choice between losing the wealth you worked for or sticking around and going down with the ship.
Gold Suppression Institution #3: The Federal Reserve
20090714_federal_reserve.jpg
Close Up of the Federal Reserve Building in Washington DC 

It should be clear by now that anything or anybody with a vested interest in the dollar will not take kindly to your owning gold, even if you're doing it solely to protect your wealth. Armed with this incontrovertible fact, it should come as no surprise that the Federal Reserve, the central banking system of the US, an all-encompassing, often mysterious entity charged with the task of issuing new money, has perhaps the most to lose from people switching over to gold as a value-holding asset.
Since the dollar is their main reason for existing, the Federal Reserve needs you to carry their dollars much like a body needs its red blood cells to carry oxygen. Without your using the dollars they create, not only is their main product devalued, but also their grasp on the nation's financial infrastructure is compromised, eventually causing them to wither.
By owning gold, you are essentially freeing yourself of the hold the Federal Reserve maintains over everything and everyone. But this choice isn't one you should be making out of the desire to be free of bureaucratic control. It's the clear choice at a time when the Fed's only product is a proven failure.
Since the Federal Reserve, unlike any other enterprise subject to consumer-driven market conditions, will never issue a recall of their defective dollars, your only choice is to move your wealth into a more stable asset like gold, whether they like it or not.
Gold Suppression Institution #4: The Mainstream Media

20090714_mass_media.jpg
Mainstream TV News
Whether it's FOX News or CNN, conservative or liberal, the engines of mass media are fueled by the revenue from their advertisers. And just like investment banks, the media depends on your continued support of corporations.
Whether these corporations provide a good service or strong returns on your investment matters little, so long as you continue to funnel your hard-earned money into their coffers.
Now, before you start to take sides on conservative vs. liberal media, let me point out that I believe both sides care less about their respective doctrines and more about advertising revenue.
For example, consider the FOX Broadcasting Company. FOX News has, of course, a very conservative voice with commentators like Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck.
But at the same time, FOX airs television programing that is anything but conservative, including some of the most unapologetically vulgar shows on television, like the popular Family Guy as well as some raunchy reality shows. The television programs on FOX are so outrageous that the company is frequently fined by the FCC for violating the nation's indecency laws.
My whole point here is that the mainstream media cares less about dogma and more about advertising revenue, which can only continue to stream in as long as corporations do well.
Of course, you'll never hear any of this from the well-compensated talking heads you'll see on the old boob tube. But buying gold may preserve your wealth, even if it takes money out of the media's pocket.
Gold Suppression Institution #5: Corporate America 

20090714_corporate_america.png
Corporate America Flag
As you've probably surmised by now, corporate America is also heavily vested in the strength of the dollar. As the dollar weakens, the values of their stocks plummet. And as inflation takes hold, consumers are less and less likely to purchase goods produced and sold by our nation's biggest companies.
Every ounce of gold you buy means hundreds of dollars lost, either by manufacturers, by retailers, or by banks that would have otherwise received the cash deposit.
Once again, you sidestep the liabilities associated with making speculative investments in their securities or blowing your money on their goods. In the process, you retain and grow your wealth, but cause them to grow weaker.
You better believe the rich executives have gold in their own portfolios. But, once again, you'll never hear them make the suggestion to you. There's just too much for them to lose.
Gold Suppression Institution #3: The IRS

20090714_irs_building.jpg
The IRS Building in Washington DC
Our favorite government entity is also one of the most vulnerable to loss of revenue when gold is bought and sold.
Notoriously hard to tax, gold is one of those things that the auditors hate seeing on income statements because of the problems associated with establishing a basis and the issues of measurable gains made at a sale. It's just too easy to lie about. The bottom line is, when trading gold privately, it's impossible for the IRS — or anyone for that matter — to know exactly how much you bought or sold the bullion for without your honestly reporting it.
The difficulties with accurately evaluating gold bullion, coins, and jewelry create a host of problems for people who need to deal in decimal places and precise figures.
In fact, the IRS has never issued a public guidance on the question of how gold is to be valued, at face or market value. This lack of specificity on their part led to a landmark loss in Nevada Federal court for a case involving 9 defendants whom the IRS tried to convict on tax evasion and other charges. Gold makes it far to easy for individual investors to legally conceal the extent of their wealth and tax liability. The IRS, as a result, has a much easier time maximizing the rate at which they can tax you when you keep your money in cash or securities.
Conclusion
Gold has a long-running history as a safety net during times of financial difficulty, a method of preserving and actually growing wealth as other sectors in the economy go into decline. It's a see-saw battle that's been going on since antiquity. Unfortunately, the two sides of the see-saw remain in perpetual conflict as investors have to make either one choice or another.
Right now, that see-saw is clearly swinging in the direction against business and industry. While certain biased sources will tell you otherwise, the choice really is pretty simple. You can either fight the see-saw and lose what you've earned, or use the mechanism to your advantage and gain while most everyone else watches their savings decline in value.
I am satisfied to wish everyone else the best of luck in seeking a better store of value in fiat currencies. I, however, will be owning gold.
Good Investing,
Alex Koyfman
Contributing Editor, Gold World
Publisher's Note:  A small group of investors have recently prospered from some valuable information in the gold markets. . . It's a rare gold investment that returns near-magical gains. And the 'gold baron' behind this investment has decided to spill the beans. You can learn all about it in this new report.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

A MUST WATCH: George Hunt UN UNCED Earth Summit 1992 (Population reduction, Bank Scams, etc..)

This classic video produced by George Hunt exposes how the progenitors of the hijacked environmental movement, people like Maurice Strong, the Rothschild family and David Rockefeller, always intended the scam to achieve global population reduction along with a global carbon tax based on a cap and trade system controlled by them.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642758020554799808


The dark side of the sustainable development movement George Hunt, a business consultant, was present at the earlier mentioned 1987 Fourth World Wilderness Congress as a member of the staff. He initially wanted to buy a ticket, George Hunt, 1992 but this proved to be much too expensive ($650).

At the conference he noticed it had very little to do with the conventional environment movement and was surprised to see people like Maurice Strong, Edmund de Rothschild (Pilgrims Society), David Rockefeller (Pilgrims Society), and James A. Baker (Pilgrims Society; Cap & Gown; trustee American Institute for Contemporary German Studies; Atlantic Council of the United States; National Security Planning Group; Bohemian Grove; CFR; Carlyle; advisor George W. Bush in his 2000 election).

In his two videos, produced in 1989 and 1992, he plays audio recordings of several of the 1987 speakers, including Maurice Strong and Edmund de Rothschild (71). There's not really a reason to label these recordings a hoax (to use UFO community language) and subsequently denounce George Hunt as a fraud. In fact, Hunt could hardly have done a better job at presenting his evidence. However, some of the evidence this person has uncovered is so amazing, that most people will remain skeptical (like me), no matter how much evidence is presented. If what Hunt is claiming is true, then it confirms the overall picture that has been sketched in this article.

First take a look at the following Fourth World Wilderness Conference (1987) statement from David Lang (spelling unknown; a Montreal banker, according to Hunt): "I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process - that would take too long and devour far too much of the funds - to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, that populates the earth. We have to take almost an elitist program, [so] that we can see beyond our swollen bellies, and look to the future in timeframes and in results which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some kind of simplistic definition." [snobby emphasis on 'simplistic']

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6642758020554799808

Monday, April 20, 2009

Ron Paul: My Conversation With Ben Bernanke, February 15, 2006

by Ron Paul

Monetary Policy and The State of the Economy hearing before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, February 15, 2006

Chairman OXLEY. The gentlelady yields back. The gentleman from Texas, Mr. Paul.

Dr. PAUL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, and welcome, Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I was very pleased with what you said about your support for transparency, and I want to ask a question dealing with that. Also, at the bottom of page 8, you said something that I thought was very important, where you said that the Federal Reserve, together with all other central bankers, has found that successful policy depends on painstaking examination of a broad range of economic and financial data, and I also think that’s very important. There is a famous quote by an economist, which I’m sure you’re familiar with, that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. And likewise, another famous economist from the 20th Century, and I’ll paraphrase this, said that monetary authorities deliberately confuse the issue of inflation by talking only about price increases. Yet it’s the price increases which are merely the inevitable consequence of inflation. This is done on purpose to distract from the real cause, which is the increase in the quantity of money and credit. And I notice in your report to the Congress, you do report M2, and it went up last year at four percent. And M3 was not mentioned, other than the fact that it won’t be reported any more. M3, interestingly enough, went up twice as fast, and M3 is going up probably more than two times as fast as the GDP. And this is information that I consider important and I know a lot of other economists consider important. And I find it rather interesting and ironic that one of the reasons that the Federal Reserve has given – of course, this was before you were the chairman – for this change is the fact that it costs money; it costs too much money. Now that is really something in this day and age, especially since the Federal Reserve creates their own money and their own budget and they have essentially no oversight, and all of a sudden it costs too much money to give us a little bit of information. So that to me is a bit ironic that this information will not be available to us. And my question to you is, would you ever reconsider this policy of denying this information to the Congress just so that we have another tool to analyze what’s going on with monetary policy? It seems like with your support for transparency, this should be something that you would heartily support.

Mr. BERNANKE. Congressman, first, you’re absolutely right. We do look at a wide variety of indicators, and money aggregates are among those indicators. In particular, M2 has proven to have some forecasting value in the past, and I think the slowdown this year is consistent with the removal of accommodation that’s been going on. In regard to your references to M3, a still broader measure of money, we have done, and I’m now speaking about the Federal Reserve before my arrival, but we have done periodic analyses of the various data series that we collect to see how useful they are. And our research department’s conclusion was that M3 was not being used by the academic community, nor were we finding it very useful ourselves in our internal deliberations. Now it’s not just a question of our own cost; although, of course, we do want to be fiscally responsible on our own budget, but it’s also I think important for us to recognize the burden that’s placed on banks that have to report this information. And so when we can reduce that burden, we would like to do so. And that was one of the considerations in the decision that was made about M3. Would we reconsider it? If there were evidence that this was an informative series and that it was useful to the public and to the Federal Reserve in forecasting the economy, naturally we would look at it again. There’s nothing dogmatic going on here.

Dr. PAUL. If the Congress expressed an interest in receiving this information, would you take that into consideration?

Mr. BERNANKE. If there was broad interest in the Congress in receiving this information, we would look at it. But, again, Congressman, remember, it’s a burden on the reporting banks to provide the information, and we are trying to reduce that burden as much as we can.

Dr. PAUL. But, of course, this has been available to the financial community for a lot of years, and for some people it’s very important to measure what you’re doing. If the money supply is important, which a lot of people believe it is, and it causes the inflation, this to me seems like we’re taking information about the money supply and literally hiding it from the people. And I yield back.

See the Ron Paul File

     
             
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

Ron Paul Archives

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul519.html

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Ron Paul: Culprits Of Financial Collapse Should Be Arrested

Not treated as saviors and given more power to “fix” the problem that they created

Ron Paul: Culprits Of Financial Collapse Should Be Arrested 120309top2

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, March 12, 2009

Congressman Ron Paul says that the people responsible for the economic crisis should not be hailed as saviors and given more power to fix the problem that they created, but arrested and criminally prosecuted.

Paul told the Alex Jones Show that the only way the private Federal Reserve could be brought under control would come as a result of a mass uprising, noting that there is a lot more awareness in Washington about the Fed’s contribution to the economic crisis.

The Congressman has two bills before Congress, one to abolish the Fed altogether and another to audit the organization.

“Today they’re protected, they’re in total secrecy and they’re protected by the law - if 1207 is passed we have an audit and they have to answer the questions and I figure, if we ever get that far and get the exposure and get the transparency that we need then people will wake up and realize, why do we have them at all,” said Paul.

The Congressman’s bill to audit the Fed is similar to another bill introduced by Bernie Sanders in the Senate which is aimed at getting the Fed to answer specific questions about where $2 trillion in bailout funds has gone, a subject that Bloomberg News sued the Fed simply to try and discover. Staggering scenes unfolded last week at a Senate budget Committee meeting when Bernanke arrogantly refused to state where any of the bailout money had gone despite repeated questioning by Sanders.

Asked if the people who caused the economic collapse should be trusted as saviors or criminally charged, Paul responded, “We should have minimal government, but even in a minimalist government your government is supposed to deal with theft and physical harm and fraud, and that’s what’s going on and that’s what they ignore or protect….it’s horrible what they’re doing….and they should be prosecuting these people, these people should be in prison.”

The Texas Congressman also discussed Obama’s monetary policy, noting that every time a new government initiative was announced to supposedly rescue the economy, the stock markets sink.

“In spite of how a lot of people think the markets don’t know what’s going on, the markets are pretty smart, so the fact that they’re not responding, in spite of all this stuff the government is doing, every time the government comes up with a new program, the markets go down even more,” said Paul, noting that free market advocates were right in warning that the problems will only begin to be resolved once liquidation is allowed to occur.

Asked how bad the economic picture would get, Paul responded, “I think it’s going to be very prolonged, I don’t see any rebound, markets may come back up and that sort of thing but to rebound I would expect it to last every bit as long as happened in the 30’s,” adding that the last depression did not really end until after a world war.

“I think it’s going to be a long long time but now we live in greater danger because people are far more demanding, they believe they have a right to their neighbors property and that’s why there’s liable to be violence….ultimately they’re going to destroy the dollar,” said the Congressman, adding that the only quick solution to the crisis was to follow constitutional principles.

Listen to the interview with Ron Paul below.

Research related articles:

  1. Ron Paul Scolds Bernanke For Skipping Congressional Financial Hearings
  2. Ron Paul: Printing Money Only Prolongs The Pain
  3. Ron Paul Grills Bernanke: “You Can’t Reinflate The Bubble”
  4. Ron Paul: Fear Based Bailouts Constitute Economic Terrorism
  5. Ron Paul on The Alex Jones Show: “A Global Financial Order”
  6. Ron Paul: Government Spending Driving Us Into Depression
  7. Paul: Wars planned to save US empire
  8. Ron Paul: Bailout Will Destroy Dollar, World Economy
  9. Ron Paul: Greenspan, Bernanke Should Be Criminally Charged
  10. CNBC Anchors Mortified That Ron Paul Was Allowed Air Time
  11. Ron Paul Slams “Born-again Budget Conservatives”
  12. Ron Paul: Obama Foreign Policy Identical To Bush

The Obama Deception Full Length

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7535755025025800195&ei=SDG5SeL2KYiGqwK6i_XzAg&q=the+obama+deception&hl=en

The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people.

The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery.

We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Orders plans. Its not about Left or Right: its about a One World Government.

The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation. Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda. If you want to know the facts and cut through all the hype, this is the film for you. Watch the Obama Deception and learn how:

* Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law.

* Obamas handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force.

* International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government.

* Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government.

* The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. The information contained in this film is vital to the future of the Republic and to freedom worldwide.

President Barack Obama is only the tool of a larger agenda. Until all are made aware, humanity will remain captive to the masters of the New World Order.

http://www.obamadeception.net  and  http://www.prisonplanet.com

*** Please SUPPORT ALEX JONES, go to the prison planet website and sign up for a membership *** Pass this video ON!

Don't let the television and mass media tell you what to choose, watch and make your own conclusions.

Monday, March 2, 2009

MUST READ! TOMORROW'S WHEAT

By Paul Cappadona

March 1, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Can you eat the yet un-harvested corn? Can we store-up tomorrow’s wheat? Can we enjoy the comfort of a chair still growing in the forest? Can we hold in our arms the yet unborn? These things belong in the future and they are beyond our reach. To obtain things from the future would be a violation of the time and space continuum or just mendacious tricks. We are led to believe we have spent our posterity’s wealth even though that wealth is unattainably in the future. The debt they claim owed is for wealth and labor beyond all present economic activity. Any reasonable mind can see that would be an illusionary accomplishment. Can we see or spend the gold or silver yet undiscovered or taste the bread from the wheat grown next year? We have been led to believe both a physical and moral impossibility. What is this spell that has tricked our minds into thinking that tomorrow’s economy is spent and how was it accomplished?

“In all honest labor there is profit. Blessed we would be if we walked in His way. For we would eat the labor of our hands: happy we would be, and it would be well with us.” Our debt is skyrocketing higher and higher while personal savings have fallen to near zero. In a true and honest Republic with free market wealth based money, that would be reversed, our savings would rise and our debts would fall. There have been crimes committed.

“Our inheritance is turned to strangers, our houses to aliens. Our necks are under persecution: we labor, and have no rest. Our public servants rule over us, and the solution is hidden that would deliver us out of their hand.” Are we guilty? We are told we are by the media and people claiming “power.” Yes we are guilty, but not for the reasons we are told. We fail when we allow deceit to dwell freely within our borders and allowing those that tell lies to remain in our employ. Isn’t it time to wake up and use the power of justice? Deceit and fraud are illegal in America making them subject to indictment.

“Deceit and fraud shall not defend, excuse or benefit any man.” Best, Evid. P469 s428;1 story, Eq Jur. S395; 3 Coke, 78; Fleta, lib. 1, c13, s15.

“The law helps persons who are deceived not those who are doing the deceiving.” Tray. Lat. Max. 149. The case of Norton Vs. Shelby County found, “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; in imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it created no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it has never been passed.” Norton Vs. Shelby County, 118U.S. 425,442.

Do not be fooled by the problems that lie ahead. We have many, but they are not to be feared. They have been used by the wicked to keep us in line.

Problems are opportunities for achievement to those that solve them.

Problems are a means to power for those that promote them.

This whole ridiculous situation is coming to a head; there are only two things we can do short of a bloody revolution.

1. We will expose, indict and prosecute the criminal psychopaths controlling us with monetized debt. Or:
2. Continue having our real wealth expropriated until they consume most of production and we begin to starve.

“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth… take it away from them and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits.” Sir Josiah Stamp the second richest man in Britain and President of the Bank of England, said at the University of Texas in 1927.

It looks to me we are already in the final stage, becoming slaves of the money creators by way of criminal politicking. Paper money, better yet monetized debt, was the tool of expropriation of our wealth and throwing a monkey wrench into the engine of economic activity. As a whole people we can not pay back more than was borrowed from a single source. When fractional reserve banking was imposed on the U.S. the interest was small and seemed payable. We were led to believe that the interest was worth paying in exchange for a flexible medium of exchange. This was a lie that we can all see by using 20/20 hind sight. Lying fraudulent debt must be cancelled, which would be to enact a grand jubilee. All other real claims on wealth must be made payable by the assets of the Federal Reserve banks and their holdings. At most all that could be paid back otherwise would be principle and that would be next to impossible seeing their money, our debt, has been spread through out the entire world.

The economic mentor of this madness was Lord Maynard Keynes and when logic exposed his flawed theories as economic suicide his answer was “In the long run we’re all dead men.” Keynesian economics has fraudulently placed us in bondage through debt and has afforded greed and money (debt notes) to keep the sham alive. Follow the money; follow the money, follow the funny money, all things that lead to our demise is well funded, and in many cases is put on our debt tab just for kicks. Why is this so, and is not this criminal? Patriotic groups can hardly rub two nickels together. Most of the patriotic groups are striking at air, not even close to the target. They are either misinformed or funded sham resistance. They ask for the last few cents we have to keep on swinging when they are not even in the same room with our enemies. The room where justice can work its blessing is the court room. We must target our local Court House, which is where our branch of power resides.

It is the people’s job to indict as well as convict. It is the people that create jurisdiction by way of the grand juries. Reason with your group; get them to do something that can make a difference or get out. We must force our elected DA to impanel a special FREE grand jury to investigate the corruption and fraud that has gone un-indicted. It is our job to investigate crimes; it is not the job of the foxes that guard the hen house. We have left this power in the street for too long... it must be reclaimed. We have the right to peacefully assemble in front of the DA’s office and pressure him or her to do their job. There is no time left, at the present time we have a right and a duty to investigate crimes both corporate and governmental. When the United States of America is fundamentally changed and the final takeover is complete, our power will be lost. Get to it.

© 2009 - Paul Cappadona - All Rights Reserved

Paul Cappadona is the Author of Taking Back America, The Party’s Over

E-Mail: cappadonaconstruction@yahoo.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest140.htm

Other Guest Articles:

Jury Rights! Jury Nullification

Where Will We Get Our Food?

Constitutional Tools No Longer Valid

More Guest Articles:

Saturday, February 21, 2009

BAILOUTS, STIMULUS PACKAGES OR REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS?

Deanna Spingola
February 21, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg appeared before the U.S. Senate and declared: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[1] To establish a world government, it is necessary to incrementally eradicate the constitution, bring the U.S. to her knees economically, and shackle the taxpayers to perpetual debt through bailouts and stimulus packages funded by printing billions of dollars of interest and debt-bearing Federal Reserve Notes to drastically devalue the currency in circulation thus impoverishing the taxpayers. The only benefactors are the extant banks, certain corporations and the individuals who concocted the financial disaster.

The colonists issued debt-free script in the 1700s commensurate to the demands of trade and industry. The citizens were self-sufficient and industrious. Incensed over the currency issue, England burdened the colonists with excess taxes to fund Britain’s imperialistic wars. This precipitated the Revolutionary War. Alexander Hamilton, a Rothschild agent, convinced George Washington to allow the Rothschilds to finance the war. In 1791, with a big war debt to be paid, Hamilton set up a central bank, owned by the Rothschilds and other foreigners called the First Bank of the United States with a twenty-year charter.[2]

Congress rejected renewal of the charter and the bank was closed on March 4, 1811. Nathan Rothschild was outraged and asked the British Parliament to declare war to reinstate the bank. The Prime Minister refused and was assassinated on May 11, 1812. Parliament declared war on June 18, 1812. British troops burned the White House and other government buildings including the one that housed the ratification papers for the U.S. constitution. The war increased our national debt from $45 million to $127 million.[3] President Madison proposed the establishment of a second central bank on December 5, 1815 for a twenty year period. It was created by Congress on January 7, 1817. Nicholas Biddle, a Rothschild protégé, became the bank’s president in 1822. President Andrew Jackson refused to renew the charter in 1836, as promised during his presidential campaign.

In opposition to the international bankers, Abraham Lincoln issued debt-free, interest-free greenbacks through the Legal Tender Act of February 25, 1862. This currency funded the Civil War, a horrific, bloody battle that took the lives of over 600,000 souls and was devised to weaken and divide the country. The privately-owned Bank of England planned to impose a gold standard on the United States. Lincoln was soon assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, a Rothschild agent. No debt-free or interest-free money has been issued in America since then.

J. P. Morgan & Company was founded in New York City in 1871 as Drexel, Morgan & Company by J. Pierpont Morgan and Philadelphia banker Anthony Drexel, agents for Europeans investing in the United States. Ultimately, they were so well capitalized that they financed much of America’s industrial expansion. By the 1890s, Morgan became an industry consolidator, reorganizing and restructuring the debts of financially troubled railroads – the Northern Pacific, the Erie, the Reading and many other railroads for a total of one-sixth of the track in the U.S. Morgan financed and merged smaller companies to create U.S. Steel, International Harvester and others. A decline in competition results in a concentration of control. In 1904, J. P. Morgan & Company loaned money to finance the Panama Canal, the largest real estate transaction in history. J. P. Morgan & Company became the world’s most powerful investment bank.

J. P. Morgan loaned money to Thomas Edison for his incandescent light research and therefore directed Edison's power generation and distribution plants. Nikola Tesla (July 10, 1856 – January 7, 1943), a Serbian who later became a U.S. citizen, was fluent in seven languages. He patented the radio on March 20, 1900, a patent usurped and used by Marconi. Tesla needed the financing that the House of Morgan offered but wishing to retain independence, he resisted the accompanying control. He had witnessed the robber baron’s 1891 aggressive takeover of the struggling Thomson-Houston Company and the Edison Company to form General Electric.[4]

Tesla had also witnessed how Morgan coveted and endangered the autonomy of Westinghouse. Morgan wanted Tesla to sign over his broad spectrum radio patents as security for the loans. Tesla had plans for a directed-energy weapon, not yet patented. Tesla proposed an end to all war. Tesla’s alternating current induction motor could have provided free, world-wide electricity to every human. Undoubtedly, Morgan, making huge profits from energy, wished to conceal that possibility. German born George H. Scherff Sr. served as Tesla’s accountant and assistant. When Tesla died, his vast collection of papers were seized and classified by the banker-obedient government.[5]

By the turn of the century, Americans paid very few taxes, had minimal debt and grew their businesses internally – without bank loans. However, by 1910, there were, throughout the country, a combination of over twenty thousand private banks and national banks, chartered by the federal government, all taking business away from the big New York City banks. Legally, banks were allowed to issue currency or bank notes. Since they operated on a fractional reserve system, they could lend out 90 percent of their deposits. This system is manageable unless demands for cash in the form of checks or depositor withdrawals are greater than their reserve cash. Many of those banks failed in orchestrated financial panics. Those remaining would be coerced to join the Federal Reserve System, soon to be established, where their reserves would be managed and controlled by a small, highly competitive, greedy group.

In the fall of 1910, six influential competitor bankers and one well-connected congressman, Republican Senator Nelson Aldrich, stealthily collaborated at Jekyll Island to plot the establishment of a shared monopoly, the Federal Reserve System. The bankers represented the interests of J. P. Morgan, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg, and Kuhn, Loeb & Company. Consequently, legislation was passed to create the Federal Reserve System in 1913, the culmination of decades of plotting by the international bankers. Under the jurisdiction of a board of directors, the U.S. was divided into twelve Federal Reserve Districts. Americans were led to believe that the Fed would eliminate financial catastrophes and stabilize the economy. In reality, the Fed is a cartel that was designed to obliterate competition and increase profits through higher prices and deceptive policies enforced by the government.

J. P. Morgan arranged the financing and purchasing of American supplies for France and Britain during World War I. By the end of that war, J. P. Morgan Bank had handled $3 billion in commercial transactions, netting $3 million in fees, and had arranged over $1.5 billion in credits to become the world’s most influential bank, moving it permanently into the political arena of foreign policy, serving as an extension of the federal government.[6]

In 1901, the U.S. national debt was less than $1 billion. After World War I, the national debt was $25 billion. Between World War I and II, it increased to $49 billion. In 1952, in the midst of the Korean War, under U.N. command, the debt stood at $72 billion. In 1962, the debt was $303 billion which increased to $383 billion by 1970 during the Vietnam War. By 1976, at the end of the Vietnam War, it was $631 billion. During the 1980s and the orchestrated Cold War military buildup, the debt increased substantially. The international bankers funded both the U.S. and the Soviet military buildup. However, all records evidencing congressional acquiescence to the massive banker-funded technological transfer from 1916 forward were classified by Eisenhower’s executive order in 1953.
[7] By 1998, the debt was over $5.5 trillion. Now, the national debt is well over $10.8 trillion. This does not include personal indebtedness such as credit cards, car loans or mortgages.

By the 1920s, banks routinely offered low-interest credit to businesses that had previously relied on profits and patience for expansion. Soon, businesses, eager for additional profit accepted the deceptively low-interest loans offered by the banks. Once hooked, businesses became dependant on banks for growth. To maintain perceptions beneficial to their objectives, bankers have always entrenched like-minded minions into influential positions such as newspaper publishers, editors, columnists, university presidents, professors, textbook writers, labor union leaders, filmmakers, and radio and television commentators.

Even after the deliberate New York Panic of 1920-21, America was still industrially strong. Farms provided adequate and toxin-free, un-genetically modified food. Our infrastructure and transportation systems were then modern and efficient and we were technologically advanced compared to the rest of the world. In 1921, U.S. per capita income was $522. In 1925, Winston Churchill, Chancellor of the Exchequer, wanting England to return to world leadership, adjusted the British pound to $4.86 which limited the amount of British goods companies and individuals around the world could afford. Consequently, over the next two years, hundreds of millions of dollars of gold flowed to the U.S. from all over Europe.[8]

Montague Norman of the Bank of England, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, Hjalmer Scacht of the Reichsbank, Benjamin Strong of the Federal Reserve, all privately-owned central banks, and Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury convened in 1927 and agreed to lower U.S. interest rates and the Fed’s discount rate. Additionally, in July, 1927, the directors of the Bank of England, the New York Federal Reserve Bank, and the German Reichsbank plotted to move the gold out of the U.S. Allegedly, this helped to generate the depression. By 1928, about $500 million in gold was transferred to Europe, especially Germany, most under the guise of post-war aid.

By 1928, U.S. per capita income grew to $628. Winston Churchill, Benjamin Strong, the New York Federal Reserve chief and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Andrew Mellon operated together to ensure that easy money for Wall Street speculation was readily available.

Newspaper and magazine articles promoted stock market speculation claiming that one could make a veritable fortune in a short time for minimum monthly investments. However, there were “special” speculators who owned dozens of accounts in various names which could be traded in enormous blocks. Small investors, never in a position to manipulate the market, suffered the consequences and received the blame for the 1929 crash. Blame for every catastrophe is always placed elsewhere.

Since Woodrow Wilson, the Fed has installed and managed many U.S. presidents. On October 25, 1929, President Herbert Hoover claimed: “The fundamental business of the country is on a sound and prosperous basis.” The crash of October 28-29, 1929 was devised. On November 8, 2002, current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said: “Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again.”[9]

In 1929-1930, the banks, purportedly because they were short on gold, would not give loans to U.S. industry and individuals. Yet, three banks, J. P. Morgan & Company, First National Bank of New York and First National Bank of Chicago, had sufficient money to send huge amounts out of the country to the Bank of International Settlements which ultimately built up Nazi Germany. The money supply was deliberately decreased, causing the Great Depression. People defaulted on their loans and the banks repossessed farms, homes and business properties. People lost their savings – everything. The banks benefited. It was an unethical, egregious redistribution of assets. The catastrophic crash was world-wide, creating joblessness, hunger, disintegration of production and national bankruptcies.

On March 7, 1930, Hoover said: “All the evidence indicates that the worst effects of the Crash upon unemployment will have passed during the next sixty days.” He then signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act against the advice of the thousand economists hired by Wall Street manipulators who were most concerned about repayment of their foreign loans. In September 1930, Bernard Baruch, after returning from a visit to Churchill in England, sent a cable affirming Churchill’s views about British world supremacy. On December 11, 1930, New York’s fourth largest bank, Bank of the United States, failed. Its 450,000 depositors had no recourse and no FDIC insurance. Another one thousand banks failed in 1930.[10] Bank failures signal bank consolidation – extant banks consume them.

The entire national debt in 1932 was $19.5 billion. Roosevelt then initiated the New Deal in 1933 by introducing the practice of deficit spending, which was the brain-child of Britain’s John Maynard Keynes, a member of the Illuminati. In 1910, Lenin said: “The surest way to overthrow an established social order is to debauch its currency.” Nine years later, Keynes wrote: “Lenin was certainly right, there is no more positive, or subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency ... The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”[11]

On March 9, 1933, Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 which declared that the U.S. was bankrupt. On April 5, 1933, Roosevelt declared a National Emergency and made it illegal for U.S. citizens to own gold. He ordered all gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates to be turned into the Federal Reserve banks by May 1 (the Illuminati was created on May 1, 1776). People would face imprisonment and fines if they refused to relinquish their gold. Further, on June 5, 1933, Congress enacted a joint resolution outlawing all gold clauses in contracts. The Federal Reserve System was not energized until 1933 when the U.S. went off the gold standard which allowed the expansion and devaluation of the money supply. The Federal Reserve collects usury on every bill printed. “Our currency has no value past the confidence of those who use it.”[12]

Gold coinage was withdrawn from circulation, and kept in the form of bullion. The public and the Federal Reserve returned their stocks of gold to the government. The people were paid $20.67 an ounce in Federal Reserve money. The Federal Reserve received Gold Certificates. So the Federal Reserve, owned by some Illuminati families, had control of the country’s gold and could control its price. The stability and responsibility of the government that issues a currency is the primary reason people accept that currency. Obviously, the collapse of that government would render the currency worthless.

Unconstrained, the bankers have financed all of the profit-producing, declared and undeclared wars. The U.S. government alleged that the Second World War was caused by obstacles to free trade, exacerbated by the financial events of 1929 manifested in Nazi fascism and responsible for the tensions that led to the Second World War. As a consequence of their questionable theory, the conditions of receiving American economic aid included the implementation of a free trade policy. Free trade policies, like central banks, only assist the bankers and the corporations who exploit cheap labor in third world countries.

World War II ended the depression. There was plenty of money. People had jobs. Women were encouraged to work – more money to service the interest payments to the Federal Reserve. Shuffling women into the workplace was really never about equal rights and opportunities, despite the rhetoric. Bankers serve on corporate boards and control corporate decisions. They depress or increase corporate stock by leveraging loans. When stock prices are depressed, bankers' agents purchase large blocks of the company's stock. The bank may then approve a multi-million dollar loan to the company which increases the stock which can be sold at a profit. Billions are accrued, enabling the purchase of additional stock. The Federal Reserve Board manipulates the market by increasing or decreasing their discount rates. Stocks soar or crash at their whim, sustained by economic experts who manipulate public opinion.

The Fed can also coerce corporations to borrow huge sums so that earnings can be siphoned off to pay the interest to the banks, reducing actual profits. Banks may collect billions in interest through corporate loans even with depressed stock prices. The bankers benefit while individual stockholders suffer. New money or credit carries debt, keeping most citizens in a never-ending cycle of debt. Dumping more money into the system, which bailouts and stimulus packages do, devalues the money already in circulation which escalates the prices of basic commodities, usually without comparable wage increases. Compound interest on mortgages and other items produces massive profits for the banks. Over the term of a mortgage, a house ultimately costs as much as three homes. With numerous taxes attached to products and services, plundered Americans are drowning in debt. If you think you are off the hook because you have paid off your mortgage, just fail to pay property taxes and see how fast the government seizes your house. We have been transformed from a debt-free nation into a debt-ridden nation.

Since 1935, the one dollar Federal Reserve Note has had the Illuminati all-seeing eye within the Great Seal. At the base of the pyramid is Roman numerals 1776, the year the Illuminati was founded. One dollar bills were printed as Federal Reserve Notes beginning in 1963. The phrase “In God We Trust” was added in 1957. Considering the enslaving amount of usury that we pay, totally eschewed by Jesus, the Fed’s use of that statement on their notes appears to be an ironic hoax on the Christian citizens of this country. The Power Elite enjoy concealing their nefarious agenda in plain sight. Under the pyramid are the Latin words – “Nova Ordo Seclorum” which means “a new order of the ages” or “new order of the centuries.” The words “Annuit Coeptis” are above the eye which means “he looks upon your endeavors favorably.” Who would that be? Some suggest that it represents Osiris, Egypt’s pagan god.[13]

In 1958, Chase Manhattan Bank introduced the Chase Manhattan Charge Plan, the first bank in the nation to offer customers a convenient, immediate gratification interest-bearing credit card. Consumer credit, encouraged by constant tantalizing media advertising, has sky-rocketed. Recently, big pharma started advertising their consistently inadequately tested, questionably-safe products. If your doctor fails to prescribe their latest miracle cure or vaccines for every minor malady, just ask for the product or injection and hope that the side effects don’t permanently harm or kill you.

On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order 11110 which directed the U.S. Treasury to issue $4,292,893,815 in interest-free U.S. Notes. On October 2, 1963, he issued NSAM 263, an order for the immediate withdrawal of 1,000 U.S. military advisors from Vietnam and a timetable for the withdrawal of all CIA operatives and U.S. personnel. This would have ended the steady stream of profits to the banks. He was assassinated on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas.

Government bailouts started in 1970 with the bailout of Penn Central which had 96,000 employees and had borrowed from most of the major banks. Additionally, those same banks held stock in the railroad and seats on their board of directors. They made many of the management decisions and were privy to insider financial information. The banks loaned the railroad more money – millions that were used to artificially inflate the stock market price and pay dividends. A month before the railroad failed and before the public was notified, Chase Manhattan’s trust department dumped 262,000 shares. The bevy of bankers who held the loans had received dividends on the worthless stock, earned interest on the loans and unloaded a total of 1.8 million share of stock after they collected the dividends.[14]

Lockheed was near bankruptcy in 1970. Bank of America had loaned them $400 million. Lockheed’s managers and employees approached congress with pleas – 31,000 jobs would be lost, national security would be at risk, sub contractors and suppliers would be hurt. Banks, due to Lockheed’s dire financial straits, would not make any further loans. Allegedly, to protect the economy, Treasury Secretary John B. Connally finagled a bailout plan guaranteed by the government (taxpayer). Once the government stepped in, the banks freely loaned Lockheed money. Ultimately, the government awarded hundreds of no-bid contracts to Lockheed which has become one of the nation’s biggest war contractors. Other similar companies who operated more efficiently lost contracts to Lockheed.[15]

Connally, a former big oil lawyer turned Texas governor, was riding in John F. Kennedy’s limousine in the motorcade and witnessed the president’s assassination.

Connally encouraged Johnson to be aggressive in accelerating and executing the war in Vietnam. When Connally was Treasury Secretary under Nixon, he oversaw a $50 billion increase in the debt limit. Additionally, he endorsed a $40 billion budget deficit referred to as a “fiscal stimulus.” At the time, five million Americans were unemployed. Secretary Connally announced Nixon’s program to increase gold prices and officially devalue the dollar. During Nixon’s administration, the U.S. was taken off the gold standard completely, a process started by Roosevelt.

Then there was the bailout of New York City, a city overflowing with corruption and a burgeoning bureaucracy. In 1975, New York, a huge welfare state, was unable to get additional credit. New York City employees, otherwise known as friends and relatives, were paid huge salaries for lower-paying comparable jobs in private industry. The city managed to get a loan from the Treasury for $2.3 billion, approved by Congress. It was enough to continue paying interest on their previous bank loans. The taxpayers suffered the consequences through massive inflation. But the banks collected their interest, a huge source of income. New York was supposed to make changes and reduce spending. That didn’t happen.[16] Chicago, with their glut of relative and friend employees, is in similar circumstances. But Mayor Daley manages to stealthily sell public property. Recently, it was the city’s parking meters. Now, in addition to inflation, citizens pay outrageous fees to park in the city which affects business. Before that, it was the famous Skyway.

Rod Blagojevich, the former Illinois governor was arrested December 9, 2008, the day after he publicly declared that the state of Illinois would suspend all business dealings with the Bank of America, the recipient of a $25 million bailout, until it restored a credit line to Republic Windows & Doors which, without credit, was forced to close and lay off their 240 employees. The governor apparently forgot who really runs everything. His indiscretions, attributable to every other professional politician, went unnoticed until he challenged the banks. Goldman Sachs, another bailout recipient, used $6.5 billion of our taxpayer dollars to give bonuses to their financial staff.

Banks create money with a computer keystroke. The money changers can print a $5 bill or a $100 bill for a few cents each. The Federal Reserve prints money to pay the obligations of the metastasizing government. Congress authorizes the Treasury Department to print U.S. bonds, held by the Federal Reserve which the government agrees to pay it back, plus interest, by plundering the labor of the taxpayers. The Fed now considers those bonds as assets, reserves to create more credit to lend to states, municipalities, individuals and businesses. Currently, banks give credit for home purchases, cars and other commodities that people used to save for. U.S. citizens depend on consumer and business credit. When that credit is arbitrarily withheld or withdrawn, industry and spending comes to a halt.

The Federal Reserve is the power behind the recently inaugurated, smooth-talking, charismatic Barack Obama who is overly-anxious to impose government control and dispense bailouts through the Stimulus Package. Through wealth transference and suppressive legislation designed to decrease liberty, each consecutive administration moves America closer to economic collapse and one world governance. Bush coerced passage of the PATRIOT Act (written long before 9/11 and unread by Congress), facilitated the Department of Homeland Security, increased the number of FEMA detention centers, allowed unrestrained illegal invasion to drain state economies (especially California), and incited invasive economy-destroying war against two countries which do not have central banks with debt-based money under the control of the international bankers. Arabs do not believe in charging or paying usury (interest on loans). By the end of 2008, the U.S. had spent $3 trillion on the Iraq War, borrowed from the Fed with interest.

With Obama, citizens will likely be disarmed, in direct violation of the 2nd Amendment, created for citizens to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. We will finally get Hillary Clinton’s universal health care. Big pharma, run in concert with big banks and insurance companies, the main benefactors. The government will make all health decisions – who lives, who dies, how many children one may bare, etc. Natural solutions for health care may be outlawed. Warfare will continue as demonstrated by the very recent deployment of 17,000 troops to Afghanistan. This, despite those campaign promises about reducing the troops. Warfare, a huge drain on our economy and a financial boon for the Fed, will continue. Troop numbers are being augmented by waiving criminal histories of those who enlist simply because they are unable to find work. The economy will ultimately bleed-out resulting in riots, food shortages and eventually martial law and perhaps mass detention.

The recent bailouts and the current stimulus package, disguised as assistance to the populace, is a huge transference of wealth – from the taxpayer’s pockets into the banker’s pockets. Any promised infrastructure enhancements may consist of such things as the completion of the unpublicized NAFTA super highway to connect Canada, the United States and Mexico. While in Denver signing the Stimulus Package, Obama said: “We will build on the work that’s being done in places like Boulder, Colorado – a community that is on pace to be the world’s first Smart Grid city.”[17] This appears to refer to an Agenda 21 program being initiated in Boulder by Xcel Energy.

Senators disregarded the taxpayer’s pleas to reject the socialist Stimulus Package. The taxpayers, stuck with the tab, are outraged. Democratic senators, including the newly-installed Roland Burris, voted for the stimulus. Burris is now under criminal investigation for his duplicitous involvement with Rod Blagojevich’s brother regarding questionable fundraising. This issue was concealed until after his guaranteed vote. Concealment of significant facts seems common with the incoming administration and its appointments. Apologies that follow embarrassing exposures somehow seem insincere.

The outrageous, squealing, pork-filled stimulus plan was designed to benefit the bankers and bleed America dry. The 1000+ page package was certainly written months ago. Pelosi, who recently claimed that America was losing 500 million jobs a month, lacks the intelligence to devise anything more that a one page yes-memo to the bankers that finance her repetitive campaigns. Congress, with few exceptions, have not represented the voters for decades. They are agents for the banks and corporations while paying lip service to their constituents during election campaigns. They profess concern for the voter’s essential needs and pass measures that appear to address those needs which in reality expand the coffers of big business and the banks. Meanwhile, members of congress collect generous salaries with regular self-approved pay increases, lobbyist perks, private health plans, and look forward to a life-long, non-Social-Security pension.

Ayn Rand (1905-1982) said in her book Atlas Shrugged: “When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed.”

Banks and corporations run a centralized, metastasizing entity, disguised as the federal government. Their objectives are promoting war while financing both sides, confiscating people's money and resources, and propagandizing the naïve masses to maintain and perpetuate their power. Our two main political parties are their servants, government departments are the spending agencies, and the Internal Revenue Service, a private offshore corporation is the collection agency.

Thomas Jefferson said: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” For part one click below.

Footnotes:

1, Liberty Tree
2, The Ultimate Yellow Brick is GOLD!
3, Financial Background, the Beginning of Monetary control by David Allen Rivera
4, The New York Times Guide to Essential Knowledge: A Desk Reference for the Curious Mind By The New York Times, Published by Macmillan 2004, pgs. 142-143
5, Tesla, Man Out of Time by Margaret Cheney, Barnes & Noble, New York, 1993, pg. 99, 80, 157-160
6, The Yamato Dynasty, the Secret History of Japan’s Imperial Family by Sterling and Peggy Seagrave, Broadway Books, New York, 1999, pgs. 116-125
7, National Suicide, Military Aid to the Soviet Union by Antony C. Sutton, Arlington House, New Rochelle, New York, 1973, p. 49
8, The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat Riott, 1994, Nanoman Press, pg. 34
9, Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke At the Conference to Honor Milton Friedman, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, November 8, 2002
10, The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat Riott, 1994, Nanoman Press, pg. 148-163
11, Gold Reserves Manipulated And Us Economy Destroyed Final Warning: A History Of The New World Order by David Allen Rivera
12, The Reality of the Debt

13, The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat Riott, 1994, Nanoman Press, pg 28.
14,
The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, American Media, 2002, pp. 41-48
15, Ibid
16, Ibid
17,
Obama’s Remarks at Stimulus Signing, New York Times, February 17, 2009, p. 2

© 2008 Deanna Spingola - All Rights Reserved

Deanna Spingola has been a quilt designer and is the author of two books. She has traveled extensively teaching and lecturing on her unique methods. She has always been an avid reader of non-fiction works designed to educate rather than entertain. She is active in family history research and lectures on that topic. Currently she is the director of the local Family History Center. She has a great interest in politics and the direction of current government policies, particularly as they relate to the Constitution.

web site: www.spingola.com

email: deanna@spingola.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna105.htm