CZARS: ARE THEY CONSTITUTIONAL?

 

 

By: Devvy
September 8, 2009
© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com

“I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within.” — General Douglas MacArthur

Americans have been shell shocked at the number of so-called "czars" the usurper in the White House has been appointing. Not only the numbers, but the backgrounds and political ideology has begun to scare people into action.

Van Jones has resigned amid an avalanche of calls for his head. Imagine a Czar calling Republicans "assholes" and being stupid enough to allow it on film! Then came the next shock to American sensibilities discovered from other film of Van Jones: this "liberal progressive" is a Red! How could Obama/Soetoro have selected a communist and who vetted him? Well, no one vetted Obama/Soetoro and since these czars are not cabinet nominees, why should the FBI bother?

They didn't bother with Obama/Soetoro and we know he is a devout Marxist through and through. Oh, relax. I don't see a "red under every bed", but the history Obama/Soetoro can't cover up or hide is there for anyone who takes the time to find out who that guy is and what he stands for. Americans didn't want to hear anything negative about Obama/Soetoro during the phony presidential race because any criticism turned into a race issue and Obama/Soetoro plays it like a master violinist.

Willliam Z. Foster said there would someday be a communist in the White House. That day arrived on January 20, 2009. In his book, Toward Soviet America, on page 271, Foster writes, "The American Soviet Government will be organized along the broad lines of the Russian Soviets." He goes on to give the blue print and how it will be done. As he outlined, it has been done toAmerica right under everyone's nose. You can read the forward to the book as I have scanned it here. Written by Francis E. Walter, Chairman, Committee on un-American Activities, House of Representatives. Never mind the screeching and squalling from the Hollyweird "progressives" or university intelligenzia. Get the facts and let the useful fools spew their bombastic gas.

Oh, but, who cares what some old dead guy said in a dusty old book years ago? Well, try: 'The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors,' for some light reading. This book is fully foot noted with sources and copies of documents. It should shake denial right out of your vocabulary.

When you finished with those, read The CommunistInternational, of the three tomes, read this one first: 1919-1943 Documents.

The author acknowledges her work would not have been possible without the "generosity" of the Rockefeller Foundation. These three volumes (at a cost of about $135.00 each when you can find one), go step by step how the countries on the globe will first be colonized, who will get destroyed in war and the relentless march towards world communism. You can see history laid out right before your eyes. The quest for global domination under communism isn't dead, folks.

Kevin Hornbuckle was elected to the city council in Eugene, Oregon, in 1992, as a registered Democrat and then came out of the closet to proudly announce in an interview: "I'd simply point out that Communists in the United States are fighting for health care, housing and jobs as a human right. I'm proud to be a communist."

How many more Communists are in the closet undermining and subverting our Constitution and sovereignty? Not only are they being elected to public office under false pretenses, these America haters are teaching in high end colleges and universities throughout the country. Your son or daughter is being taught the toxic and destructive doctrine called communitarianism (communist morality); see here.

Comrade Obama's "czars"

Global warming hoax czar-ette is Carol Browning, the former Clinton-era director of the unconstitutional Environmental Protection Agency (1993-2000). Browner is a "liberal progressive." She is a socialist right down to her red knickers.

Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People's Organs Without Explicit Consent

September 04, 2009

(CNSNews.com) – "Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken. Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done."

The list goes on. Yesterday (Labor Day), the usurper announced his selection for Manufacturing Czar. I give credit to Glenn Beck, actually his staff, for their meticulous research of all Obama/Soetoro's anti-American czars. The entire list is here. Please note how many have 'unknown' next to salary. The American people are being raped in taxes to pay for all these comrades, yet we are not allowed to know what these dangerous individuals are being paid?

The whole crew is part of Obama/Soetoro's agenda to restructure our constitutional republic into a modern day Soviet Union. Okay, scoff all you want at such a statement. I know otherwise because I have studied this for almost 20 years while boobs out there who huff and puff and say it ain't so have been glued to the great programmer (TV) watching nonsense. If you want to know how Americans have been seduced over time to accept what once was the unacceptable, read these when you have time:

Communizing America
Funny how things jog your memory

You can't fight your enemy if you can't identify who they are and their battle plan.

Are these czars constitutional? That means does Obama/Soetoro have any legal authority to "appoint" these people?

No, he does not. Remember when new world order minion, Papa Bush, appointed Bill Bennett his new "drug czar"? Where were conservatives then? Why weren't they demanding Bennett be sent on his way because Bush had no legal authority to appoint this czar? Now, "conservative" Republicans in Congress are making lots of noise about Obama's czars. Same old hypocrites.

Many are jumping up and down chanting, "This is socialism." No, it's communism. There is a difference between all these forms of government:

Marxism: The political and economic ideas of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as developed into a system of thought that gives class struggle a primary role in leading society from bourgeois democracy under capitalism to a socialist society and thence to Communism.

Communism: A theory or system of government in communal ownership as in goods and property are distributed for a11, except those at the top who control the masses.

Fascism: A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism; oppressive or dictatorial control.

Obama/Soetoro is often referred to as a "cultural Marxist." He is that and more. The usurper spent 20 years attending Rev. Wright's church and getting a good dose of Marxism dressed up as "Black Liberation Theology." Oh, that's right. Obama/Soetoro didn't hear any of it, just like Billy Clinton didn't inhale or "have sex with that woman." For a superb analysis on that issue, read: The Marxist Roots of Black Liberation Theology

Last February, Senator Robert Byrd, to his credit, sent the usurper a letter admonishing him for all these czars. Why? Byrd patiently explained to the hot shot lawyer in the White HOuse that they violated "both the constitutional system of checks and balances and the constitutional separation of powers, and is a clear attempt to evade congressional oversight." I can find no reference (on the Internet) that Byrd raised an objection to Papa's Bush's unconstitutional appointment of Bill Bennett. However, since Obama has "appointed" more czars than any past ruler of Russia, I guess Byrd feels the senate is being pushed aside.

Obama’s Unconstitutional “Czars” - August 29, 2009: "As I read it, the Constitution is very specific about whom the President may appoint and he can do so only within parameters “established by law” and this applies specifically to the “heads of departments.” I interpret this to mean Cabinet Secretaries, all of whom must be vetted and approved for their positions by the Senate.

"The Republican National Committee's conservative caucus recently passed a resolution expressing their concern noting that “The U.S. Constitution explicitly states government officers with significant authority (called ‘principal officers’) must be nominated by the President and are subject to a vote of the U.S. Senate.”

Obama’s appointments are clearly “principal officers” though it will be argued that they are only advisors to the office of the President. Clearly, Obama’s appointments are not heads of departments, but they appear to have been granted an unknown degree of influence and control as regards their responsibilities. They function “in the dark.”

What can be done?

This is the crux of the matter. Individuals and businesses must fight back. How? If any decision, recommendation, policy or otherwise is issued that affects you or your business, a lawsuit must be filed. Not pro se (meaning by the individual), but by experienced constitutional attorneys who know the U.S. Constitution and the Leviathan maze called federal courts. Who says we have to take this from Obama's "czars"? I say we don't. No one wants to do more court battles, but this issue of czars and conflict with the supreme law of the land must be resolved as quickly as possible. Both parties have sat back over the decades and allowed this kind of nonsense to go on and under Obama/Soetoro, it has reached the breaking point.

For one thing, as a usurper, Obama/Soetoro has no legal authority to do anything. He sure as heck has no legal authority to appoint these czars with their toxic ideology to run rough shod over we the people. This is our country, not theirs.

There are outstanding constitutional law firms in this country with the best legal minds who can take this to court and win. The question is: Will we fight or simply whimper along with a thousand excuses?

I highly recommend these research items and commentary:

1 - Van Jones Mystery Solved?
2 - Red & Green
3 - Obama's communists
4 - Leading “Progressive” Describes Obama-Chavez Axis

1 - Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection
2 - Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection
3 - List of Communist goals (most already a done deal)

© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country as well as her own; ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker.

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

It isn't possible to respond to 20,000 emails a month. Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her web site; it has been updated and filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources

E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd465.htm

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS ALREADY HERE

By Lynn Stuter

March 24, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Many have foretold the coming of a constitutional crisis if Also Known As (AKA) Obama does not produce the documents proving his eligibility to the office of president. AKA has made it very apparent that he does not intend to produce the documents willingly because to do so would show that he knew he was ineligible from the outset; that the only conspiracy in this matter was the conspiracy in which he engaged to defraud the American people.

Congress, at the time fully aware of the evidence proving AKA ineligible, refused to object to the certifying of the Electoral College on January 8, 2009. Further, and after the fact, they continue to make such inane and stupid claims as “he’s produced his birth certificate”; “he was born in Hawaii”; “he has been vetted by the vote of the people” knowing full well that such is not true.

The Supreme Court and lower courts refuse to address the issue, making such inane claims as “standing”, “moot after the fact”, “frivolous”; or no comment at all. In Allen v Bowen, the judge dismissed, claiming it the duty of Congress to address the matter at the time of the certifying of the electoral college; that outside that objection, no legal remedy exists.

In another recent case, Hollister v Soetoro, Federal Judge James Robertson dismissed, claiming …

"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency…”

Not only is this a lie, but in stating this, Judge Robertson violated judicial canons wherein judges are to refrain from making decisions based on facts not in evidence. It is very apparent that Judge Robertson made this statement based on personal opinion or on information he obtained outside the scope of the pleadings before him.

If ever there was a case of judicial misconduct, Judge James Robertson is a candidate.

When an American citizen had the temerity to call Robertson on the carpet for his conduct, that citizen was visited and threatened by U.S. Marshall’s in a manner reminiscent of Hitler’s Gestapo.

But what becomes apparent, in all of these absurd judicial machinations, is that, no matter what, the people will not find justice via the courts because equal justice under the law does not exist. This, of itself, is a violation of the United States Constitution in which rule is by law, where money, power and position is to make no difference in how the court rules. Such has clearly not been the case with preferential if not exclusionary treatment being afforded AKA.

At this point in time it should be crystal clear to the American people that neither the judicial nor the legislative branches of our government are functioning within the bounds of the United States Constitution.

On January 20, 2009, we watched AKA and Justice Roberts bungle the oath of office. It was reported that the oath was retaken in a private ceremony the following evening. In light of the fact that these people have been proven liars, we don’t know that this is true. And in light of AKA’s ineligibility to the office of president, the bungling of the oath is just a little too convenient.

If AKA did not take the oath, he cannot be criminally charged as having taken the oath when he knew he was ineligible.

Since January 20, 2009, the American people have watched as bill after bill, directly targeting the freedoms and rights of the American people, have sailed through Congress with little opposition. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, is so ecstatic over her part in helping AKA destroy this nation that she has even had the unmitigated gall to tell illegal aliens that the existing laws making them criminals are un-American, thus violating her oath of office.

Massive bills, obviously unread by legislators, have zipped through Congress at the speed of a run-away train. H.R. 1 (the piggy package of pork barrel spending), 407 pages; H.R. 1105 (omnibus appropriations, 2009) 465 pages; HR 1388 (the GIVE act), 310 pages.

H.R. 1 is $787 billion in nothing but pork barrel spending; H.R. 1105 follows suit with another $410 billion in pork barrel spending at a time when America cannot afford to grow government or spend that kind of money on pet projects.

H.R. 1388 begins the process of establishing the AKA civilian national security force; the brainwashed Marxist brownshirt goon squad not unlike those that aided Hitler and that the German people learned to hate and fear.

And last week saw more “scandal” regarding TARP money; this time involving the payment of “bonuses” by AIG. It seems that Timothy “I’m Turbo-tax challenged” Geithner knew the bonuses would be paid but did nothing because to stop the bonuses, issued under contract, could result in lawsuits. Christopher “I’m so confused” Dodd didn’t know a thing about it, then he did because Geithner wasn’t taking the heat alone, then it came to light that it was the language Dodd had inserted into the bill that allowed the bonuses to be paid; and that Dodd knew full well why the language was inserted.

But in light of the lies the American people were told about the TARP money, its purpose and what it would be used for, are we being told the truth about the AIG bonuses? I recently received the following explanation of the AIG situation,

“The payments, popularly known as ‘bonuses’, are actually deferred contractual obligations AIG entered into over a year ago with certain very specialized traders who were critical to the performance of the Financial Products Division of AIG. Generally, the contracts were engaged with the intent of retaining these traders for a period of one year, providing the traders achieved certain benchmark performance during the year. Retention of traders through the year is tactically important to their customers.

The ‘bonus’ calculations were based on the traders' commitments and level of successful performance per their respective metrics. The formulae used were ordinary and customary to the industry and cannot be fairly classified as ‘extravagant’. There was nothing unusual about these contracts and to accuse AIG of irresponsibility in their actions is inappropriate. In fact, it would have been irresponsible of AIG to not use these contracts as has become normal to their industry and critical to retaining highly qualified employees. AIG's customers rely heavily on the subject traders in their business transactions with AIG.

This subject has become a popular means of demonstrating political posture to an uninformed public. It has also become a distraction from more important economic maneuvers that have been occurring unnoticed by the media. Over a trillion dollars has been distributed over the past few days with little mention by the media … Obviously, this distraction by the current administration was successful.”

Is it possible this is the case and all the pontificating, posturing, and finger-pointing coming out of Congress is nothing more than diversionary tactics to conceal not only the truth but what is really going on in DC while the media keeps the public focus on this “outrage”? While I have not been able to verify this as the case, doesn’t this make just as much sense, considering the lies the American people were told about TARP, as does the bilge coming out of Congress?

Regards the AIG “scandal”, the House passed H.R. 1586 on March 19, 2009 by a vote of 328 – 93, taxing certain bonuses of companies receiving TARP funds; the constitutionality of this bill has already come into question making it apparent that it was a knee jerk reaction to appease the people as opposed to actually dealing with the issue, which it appears, doesn’t exist. While it is doubtful the bill ever makes it out of the Senate, it is obvious the Congress hopes the outrage of the people at this contrived “scandal” will be appeased so Congress can move on to the next contrived crisis with the people being none the wiser.

And what this all says, bottom line, is that you can’t trust a word out of the mouth of your elected representatives in Washington, DC. Fancy that!

The American people are under attack, not only by Congress but by a Marxist, sitting in the Oval Office, who is not an American citizen, holds no allegiance to this country, hates this country and everything it stands for, and would like nothing better than to see it destroyed at his hand.

With every passing day, more and more people are waking up; even those who voted for AKA believing his lies about “hope and change”, who have realized the man is a pathological liar who can’t string two cohesive words together without the aid of a teleprompter. Everything has to be scripted for him making it apparent he hasn’t an original thought in his head, he’s just an empty suit with a pleasing voice and great delivery. Even the bumbling misspeak of George Bush is preferable to this bozo’s insincere newspeak.

None of this, including the protests that have met AKA at every townhall meeting he has attended since becoming the usurper-in-chief, has been reported by the lamestream media whores. Are we surprised, given the fact that lamestream media has been, for many years now, complicit in that which serves to undermine the United States Constitution and destroy freedom?

Yet to come on AKA’s agenda of destruction are socialized medicine, gun control, controlling food, and bringing children under full control of the state.

H.R. 875 and S 425 have been introduced, essentially outlawing small farms, organic farms and the family garden. If you want to eat, you will conform; otherwise the state will deprive you of food under the auspices of your being a non-conforming “useless eater.”

S. 244 has been introduced to address early childhood learning, bringing young children under the aegis of the state in promulgating life-long learning, cradle to grave. The nanny state of life-long human resource development in the interests of the state; no better than chattel.

This past week saw the publication of a memo ordering Army personnel at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to surrender information to their command regarding privately owned weapons. When the memo came to light, it was quickly claimed a “mistake.” Was it, or was it a test to see how a captive audience—in that they are under direct government command and control—would respond to such an order? In the day and age when military personnel are being asked whether they would fire on American civilians, when we know Marxist AKA wants the populace disarmed, only a fool ignores the implications of such a memo.

In Washington DC we have AKA’s anti-gun Attorney General, Eric Holder, calling for gun control in the name of keeping guns out of the hands of Mexican drug cartels. Maybe Holder should look into the CIA as the source of those guns; but then, having the CIA supplying guns south of the border serves AKA’s purposes in instituting gun control in America.

How many times do we need to see the created crisis played out in the name of achieving a government agenda to realize that the government is more than likely complicit, if not the culprit, in the type of armaments showing up south of the border?

Chaos reins at this very moment. A constitutional crisis isn’t coming, it arrived on January 20, 2009. AKA is creating crisis after crisis for the purposes of creating chaos, not the least of which surrounds the fact that he is ineligible to the office of president. This usurper is not our legal president, and as such, has no authority to sign any bill into law, yet he is doing so and those laws are being implemented as though legal authority exists, appropriating (stealing) money from the American people to be used by the government to further oppress the people.

And the only ones who can stop this are the American people. Thomas Jefferson stated that the tree of liberty must, from time to time, be refreshed with the blood of tyrants and patriots.

It becomes more apparent, day by day, that the tree of liberty, if it is to survive, will survive only at the price of blood; that this is not a situation of our choosing; it is a situation being forced upon us by Marxists intent on destroying our nation.

As never before, we must seek the wisdom and counsel of God.

© 2009 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved

Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.

Web site: www.learn-usa.com

E-Mail: lmstuter@learn-usa.com 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter148.htm

Taitz to FBI: Investigate 'tampering' at Supremes: 305 million Americans need to know if foreign national is usurping presidency'

Posted: March 21, 2009
12:15 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Orly Taitz

A California attorney battling on a number of fronts to obtain documentation of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president is asking the FBI and U.S. Secret Service to investigate suspected "tampering" at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Orly Taitz, who is pursuing nearly half a dozen causes through her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, says the issue of Obama's eligibility to meet the Constitution's demand for a "natural born" president has been before the Supreme Court at least four times.

But she wonders whether the justices actually were given the pleadings to review.

"I believe … that there was tampering with documents and records by employees of the Supreme Court and the justices never saw those briefs," she alleges in a letter to the FBI's Robert Mueller, the Secret Service's Mark Sullivan and Attorney General Eric Holder.

"Three hundred five million American citizens … need to know whether a foreign national is usurping the position of the president and the commander in chief," she wrote.

Taitz raises questions about "forgery of court records, tampering with court records, cyber crime, erasing of court records from the docket, fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud and other related crimes."

Specifically, she points to the handling of her own case, Lightfoot v. Bowen, which was submitted to the Supreme Court on an emergency basis. Although it was scheduled for a conference, no hearing ever was held.

Join one third of a million people who are seeking the truth on whether Obama meets the Constitution's "natural born" citizenship clause.

Taitz notes that references to the case were erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on Jan. 21, shortly after Obama, the defendant, met with eight of the nine justices behind closed doors.

It happened just two days before her case was scheduled to be reviewed in conference.

Secondly, Taitz notes that in her conversation with Justice Antonin Scalia at a book-signing in Los Angeles several weeks ago, he appeared to have no knowledge of the cases that had been submitted.

She said she mentioned her case and those brought by Cort Wrotnowski, Philip Berg and Leo Donofrio.

"In the presence of several attorneys, law students and Secret Service agents Justice Scalia kept saying that he didn't know anything … even though all of the plaintiffs have received notification that all of those cases were reviewed by all nine justices," she said.

Taitz said she's also concerned that the Supreme Court docket was somehow modified.

"Did somebody from outside break and enter into the computer system of the Supreme Court or was it done by one of the overzealous employees who wanted to keep Obama in the White House?" she asked.

"I demand to see the printout of entries of both internal docket seen by justices and the external docket seen by the public to verify if those were identical at all times, particularly between January 20th and January 23rd," she said.

She also raised the possibility that justices' signatures may have been "stamped" on documentation.

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts

Her allegations, she said, were part of what she submitted to Chief Justice John Roberts when she met him at the University of Idaho a week ago.

"Due to the … great urgency of the matter in relation to the national security of the United States … I demand immediate investigation of this matter," Taitz wrote.

Taitz also is developing a Quo Warranto case that has been submitted to Holder.

Essentially, the case demands to know what authority Obama is using to act as president. An online constitutional resource says Quo Warranto "affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

As WND reported, Taitz already has submitted a motion to the Supreme Court for re-hearing of Lightfoot v. Bowen, a case she is working on through Defend Our Freedoms alleging some of her documentation may have been withheld from the justices by a court clerk.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, some suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Although Obama officials have told WND all such allegations are "garbage," here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

• New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.
  
• Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, (now dismissed) brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.
  
  
• Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.
  
• Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.
  
• Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case was dismissed by Judge Michael P. Kenny.
• 
  
• Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.
  
  
• Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.
  
  
• In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.
  
  
• Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.
  
  
• In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.
  
  
• In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.
  
• California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.

In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

• In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.
  
  
• In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.
  
  
• In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

 

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=92393

Obama plans huge pledge drive for his policies

Gag me with a pitchfork!...

Obama plans huge pledge drive for his policies

Matthew B. Stannard,Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Staff Writers

Friday, March 20, 2009

President Obama's appearance on "The Tonight Show" - the first ever for a sitting chief executive - was only a small part of the president's so-called permanent campaign. A bigger move comes Saturday, when Obama will ask 13 million people on his campaign e-mail list to go door-to-door to raise support for his agenda.

The Pledge Project Canvass is an unprecedented effort by a president to reach beyond Congress and tap grassroots supporters for help. Volunteers recruited online by Obama's Organizing for America, a post-election group, will ask citizens to sign a pledge in support of the president's policies on energy, health care and education.

Those who pledge will be asked for their e-mail addresses so the Obama-ites can keep in touch.

"This is just the beginning for us," said Jeremy Bird, deputy national director of Organizing for America, in an online video to Obama supporters this week. "The establishment in Washington won't welcome this new direction easily. We can't let this plan be debated solely behind closed doors in Washington, D.C."

Analysts marvel

Technology and political analysts marvel at the potential of Obama's attempt to transfer his successful campaign techniques - a melding of street-level community organizing and new media tools - to advance his policy agenda.

"What Obama is doing is a very new approach," said Lawrence Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota.

That approach began during the campaign, when Obama tapped into an array of social networking tools on sites such as Facebook and Twitter to rally voters and raise funds. This weekend's effort is the next logical step, Bird said in an interview.

"This is taking that online social networking and moving it to offline social networking," he said.

But beneath the excitement over the White House's virtual populism is the question: What effect will it have? What's the difference between Saturday's door-knocking and petition-signing effort, however digitally organized, and Franklin D. Roosevelt's use of radio to rally the country around his New Deal proposals?

Also, the outreach effort could have a boomerang effect. If the same individuals who joined Obama's army of supporters feel he has overly compromised on some issues, such as health care, they could use those same networks to lash back at him.

"It could be like Frankenstein's monster coming back at him," said Mike Franc, a former staff member for Capitol Hill Republicans who is a congressional liaison for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

Administration concerns

The most immediate concern for the administration is making sure the outreach doesn't look to Congress like a postcard-writing campaign by "the usual suspects," Franc said. "If it creates a cross-section of support in a district, then a politician will start looking into his political soul and wondering if he should start supporting Obama."

The challenge will be to reignite the passion that propelled Obama's presidential campaign - but on specific issues.

"The idea of volunteering to help pass a health care plan or help pass a budget is something fewer people have had experience with," said Justin Ruben, executive director of the online liberal organizing site MoveOn.org.

Indeed, Saturday will mark "the first big test of Organizing for America and whether the base that they built during the campaign is still there," said Micah Sifry, editor of TechPresident.com, an online hub for the study of how technology affects politics. "I think there are reasons to believe that it's ebbed quite a bit since the election."

For example, Sifry said, house parties organized last month were sparsely attended in some cases. And the YouTube videos announcing this weekend's pledge drive were receiving less traffic than past Obama videos have.

That could be because Obama is not pitching the pledge drive, Sifry said. (Organizing for America's Mitch Stewart and Bird are the video's stars.) Or it's possible that in the months since the election, Obama's social network has been a little turned off by frequent fundraising appeals and a lack of real opportunity to influence Obama's agenda.

3,500 house parties

But where some saw sparseness in last month's events, Bird said he saw an "unbelievably phenomenal" response: about 3,500 house parties across the nation and 80,000 personal stories uploaded by citizens to the Organizing for America site - with no paid staff or organizers.

In the past, Bird said, "nothing like that would ever happen without a massive number of staff, organizers making countless phone calls. Particularly around something that's not necessarily that sexy when you just see it on face value."

David All, who heads a conservative Web 2.0 agency, said it's almost irrelevant whether this weekend's push results in a horde of canvassers and calls to Congress. Obama's team has taken the long view, he said, and is more focused on continuing to build its social network than on scoring splashy successes.

"It's already succeeded," he said. "Even if they had 100 (participants), that is 100 more than what would have happened without it."

It's a lesson, he said, the conservative opposition has yet to fully grasp. Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele now posts to YouTube, and GOP.com is scheduled for an overhaul. But Obama, he said, remains far ahead in his ability to repeatedly tap the grass roots and maintain what Jimmy Carter adviser Patrick Caddell dubbed the permanent campaign.

"Republicans are still sitting around saying, 'What happened?' " Steele said. "If I were a 2012 candidate, you'd better believe I'd be out there today working against this thing."

Other presidents with direct appeals

Previous U.S. presidents who sought citizen support for domestic agendas:

Franklin D. Roosevelt: Shortly after taking office in 1933, Roosevelt began to broadcast a series of "fireside chats" to rally Americans about his New Deal package of legislation. Congress passed 15 of Roosevelt's major bills in his first 100 days in office.

Ronald Reagan: The former actor was comfortable on camera and used television addresses in his first months in office to connect with viewers - most successfully when he asked voters to write their legislators and urge them to repeal taxes. Measures to do that were passed.

Bill Clinton: Clinton traveled the country in 1993 to push for health care reform. But he, Hillary Rodham Clinton and their surrogates often were met by well-organized opponents. Their package never got a congressional floor vote. Wrote Hillary Clinton in her 2003 memoir: "We soon learned that nothing was off limits in this war and that the other side was far better armed with the tools of political battle: money, media and organization."

George W. Bush: In early 2005, Bush used the "political capital" he asserted he had received from his 2004 re-election to promote a revamping of the Social Security system. He crisscrossed the country to drum up support for his proposal, but after GOP defections, it never even got a vote in Congress.

E-mail the writers at mstannard@sfchronicle.com and jgarofoli@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/20/MNMO16JJDF.DTL&tsp=1

Also Read:

Barack Obama and The Altar of Greed

It is no exaggeration to say that this vibrant and well-liked president, who carries the hopes and aspirations of a nation on his shoulders with a robust foundation of good will to match, is potentially giving away everything in order to make sure that a band of corporate pirates keep their stolen taxpayer money. And doing that, ladies and gentlemen, is as dumb as... Well, you know...a bag of hammers.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/20862

Paul Krugman: Obama bank plan a total "fantasy."

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/21/more-on-the-bank-plan/

More military officers demand eligibility proof

Plaintiff: 'In the worst case … it's going to be revolution in the streets'

Posted: March 02, 2009

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Military officers from the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines are working with California attorney Orly Taitz and her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, citing a legal right established in British common law nearly 800 years ago and recognized by the U.S. Founding Fathers to demand documentation that may prove – or disprove – Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.

Taitz told WND today she has mailed to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder a request that he "relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II to test his title to president before the Supreme Court."

The lengthy legal phrase essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obama is using to act as president. An online constitutional resource says Quo Warranto "affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

Requesting the action are Maj. Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr. David Earl-Graef; police officer Clinton Grimes, formerly of the U.S. Navy; Lt. Scott Easterling, now serving on active duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. Timothy Comerford; Tennessee state Rep. Frank Nicely and others.

"As president-elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as president elect, Respondent Obama failed [tO] qualify per U.S. CONST. Amend. XX [paragraph] 3," the document said.

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, an organization founded by former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore after he was removed from office for formally recognizing the Ten Commandments' influence in the U.S., said the demand is a legitimate course of action.

"She basically is asking, 'By what authority' is Obama president," he told WND. "In other words, 'I want you to tell me by what authority. I don't really think you should hold the office.'

"She probably has some very good arguments to make," Eidsmoe said.

The letter, dispatched to Holder today, is the latest development in the quest by a multitude of lawyers and plaintiffs nationwide for documentation that Obama qualifies to be president under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 300,000 others and sign up now!

Several of the cases have involved emergency appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court in which justices have declined even to hear arguments. Among the cases turned down without a hearing at the high court have been petitions by Philip Berg, Cort Wrotnowski, Leo Donofrio and Taitz.

Taitz' plaintiffs, some of whom potentially face life-or-death situations in defense of the U.S. Constitution on a daily basis, note that information on Quo Warranto against a federal officer normally is related to the attorney general. But since Holder is an Obama friend and appointee, they are asking for the appointment of a special prosecutor to help in presenting documentation to the Supreme Court.

"This information on Quo Warranto includes action between the United States ex rel. and the State of Hawaii over original birth records of Barack H. Obama II being withheld per Hawaii's privacy laws. Hawaii's action obstructs the constitutional duties of election officers to validate or evaluate President Elect Obama qualifications to become President under U.S. CONST. art. II § 1, and amend. XX § 3," the document said.

Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents, "he does not want the public to know."

What else could be the reason for his hiring law firms across the nation to fight any request for information as basic as his Occidental College records from the early 1980s, he asked. A separate lawsuit has sought the documents to find out whether they indicate Obama, possibly under the name Barry Soetero, attended the college on aid for foreign students.

Obama's critics warn of the impending constitutional crisis should it be discovered Obama is ineligible and the resulting chaos of trying to figure out what, if any, of his executive branch orders, should be valid.

According to the online Constitution.org resource: "The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

Taitz told WND the "relators" include members of the Army, Air Force, Marines and Army and feature recipients of some of the highest honors the nation awards, including the Purple Heart.

One is Harry Riley, a veteran military officer who spent part of his career in the Pentagon. Riley said the issue is basically over whether Americans will allow "the trashing" of their Constitution.

"Myself, along with hundreds of thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S. Constitution. The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis, in my judgment. How can an individual become the commander-in-chief, or the president of the U.S., with questions regarding his constitutional qualifications?" he asked.

"The whole idea is that America cannot allow an individual to serve as president who isn't qualified. It destroys our Constitution. It's the bedrock of our nation," he said.

"In the worst case, in the long run, if he continues [to fight revealing his documentation,] it's going to be revolution in the streets," he warned.

"It's simply a matter of producing a $12 birth certificate," Riley said.

"It's just mindboggling to think an individual who's been sworn in as the president of the United States would be so small and be such a hypocrite who would be unwilling to simply show a birth certificate," Riley said.

Taitz told WND she has assembled a list of about 100 names of people – so far – who are willing to be plaintiffs in such a demand.

Childers told WND he'd be perfectly happy if Obama is legitimate, but the truth still matters.

"I personally admire many things about him," he said. "But if he's not legitimate, if he's allowed to violate the Constitution, what else are they going to violate? Take my guns, and my television, telephone? What's the limit?"

Taitz told WND she's asking for the appointment of a special prosecutor, such as the role Archibald Cox played in investigating Watergate.

According to author Chester Antieau in his "The Practice of Extraordinary Remedies," Quo Warranto is one of the oldest rights in common law.

"The earliest case on record appears in the 9th year of Richard I, 1198," he wrote. "The statute of 9 Anne c. 20 in 1710 authorized a proper officer of a court, with leave of the court, to exhibit an information in the nature of quo warranto, at the 'relation' of any person desiring to prosecute the same – to be called the relator. Early American statutes were modeled after the Statute of Anne and, indeed, the statute has often been ruled to be part of the common law we inherited from England."

Antieau noted the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled, "Quo warranto is addressed to preventing a continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted, rather than to correct what has already been done. ..."

Its first recognize purpose, he said, is "to determine the title of persons claiming possession of public offices and to oust them if they are found to be usurpers."

Among those who are subject to its demands, under court precedent, are chief executives in other U.S. governmental positions, including governors and sheriffs.

As WND has reported on several occasions, none of the so-called "evidence" of Obama's constitutional eligibility produced thus far is beyond reasonable doubt nor as iron-clad as simply producing an authentic birth certificate, something Americans are required to do regularly but the president still refuses to do.

As Jerome Corsi, WND senior staff writer, explained, "The main reason doubts persist regarding Obama's birth certificate is this question: If an original Hawaii-doctor-generated and Hawaii-hospital-released Obama birth certificate exists, why wouldn't the senator and his campaign simply order the document released and end the controversy?

"That Obama has not ordered Hawaii officials to release the document," Corsi writes, "leaves doubts as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists for Obama."

Although Obama officials have told WND all such allegations are "garbage," here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

• New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.
  
• Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.
  
  
• Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.
  
• Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.
  
• Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.
  
• Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.
  
  
• Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.
  
  
• In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.
  
  
• Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.
  
  
• In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.
  
  
• In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.
  
• California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.

In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

• In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.
  
  
• In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.
  
  
• In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions, the biggest being why, if there exists documentation of Obama's eligibility, hasn't it been released to quell the rumors.

Instead, a series of law firms have been hired on Obama's behalf around the nation to prevent any public access to his birth certificate, passport records, college records and other documents.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=90574

OBAMA SUPPORTERS: DECEIVED OR JUST PLAIN LIARS?

By: Devvy
March 2, 2009

© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com

The Obama phenom appears to be waning as Americans continue to see jobs hemorrhaging while Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka and so forth, attempts to openly shove communism down our throats while destroying free markets and jobs in the process. 'The Great One' has proven in a record short period of time that he's a liar already breaking campaign promises. For those of us who live in the real world and follow these glory seekers parading as "public servants," we have come to expect no less. The two political machines, vote fraud and millions of uninformed, under educated and partisan voters bring the worst into office. Now the chickens have come home to roost and the suffering will continue for years.

Party hacks and fanatics on both sides invent lies about their tarnished heroes because they cannot face betrayal. These are the cowards who will go to extraordinary lengths to keep morally and ethically bankrupt career politicians in office, in this case, a true communist, because they can't face the truth that 'The One' might have lied to them. Never mind the disastrous path which Obama intends to take this country should he stay in office. The same blind loyalty was seen during the last election by supporters of Juan McCain, a vile individual. It didn't matter that McCain is for full amnesty for criminals (illegal aliens), that he has taken money from terrorists or that he has been the key factor in selling out our POW/MIAs, the party faithful defended him instead of driving him out of office.

A quintessential example of yellow journalism and bald faced lies appears at this web site: Promoting Mutiny to Get Obama.

The "managing editor" uses a lie to grab your attention. None of the active duty soldiers or veterans who will be plaintiffs in the new lawsuit regarding the usurper president have encouraged or even spoken of mutiny. It appears Jason is ignorant of the definition of mutiny.

This mental midget then prints another fat lie: "Even though both the campaign and the Hawaii Secretary of State have released documents that refute claims that Obama was born somewhere other than Hawaii, some members of the conspiracy-minded right find the issue to be a useful outlet for their anti-Obama crusade."

Obama has never released his vault long form birth certificate. A forgery was posted on FactCheck.org.

The Secretary of State (Hawaii) has never "released documents that refute" anything. Jason couldn't even identify the right agency.

This is deliberately inflammatory and also a fat lie: "Now, they have turned to promoting mutiny, encouraging soldiers to reject Obama’s claim to be commander-in-chief and join in lawsuits against the President. Such moves cross the line from even tolerable forms of fringe dissent to potentially criminal actions. Encouraging soldiers to refuse orders is a violation of both military and civilian law, and rightly so."

Is Jason mentally ill, deceived or just a run of the mill liar with no credibility? I believe he qualifies for the third category. Never have I seen so many opinions or "facts" (lies) printed on the Internet about court cases that have ZERO basis in truth or reality. You can bet this Jason person hasn't read a single brief in any of the 40 cases or he would not so cavalierly refer to them as frivolous. However, truth has no place in Jason's world, only hero worship of a narcissist.

Marginalize, demonize and more lies

The Birthers' Continue to Hound Obama; AOL

(March 1) - "Ever since Barack Obama became a prominent political fixture in the country, he has encountered a fair number of rumors and smears concerning him and his family. There was the one rumor about him being a secret Muslim (he is a practicing Christian). And there was the one allegation his wife, Michelle, was caught on videotape using the word "whitey" (no such clip has ever surfaced).

"Most of the charges were, for the most part, put to rest by vigorous responses from the Obama team during the campaign. But one conspiracy theory lives on -- despite overwhelming evidence debunking it. Politico.com reports that the Birthers -- a persistent group of conservatives who believe Obama is ineligible to be president because of alleged questions surrounding his birth status -- continue to operate and thrive on the fringe."

That's right. All these attorneys, active duty military, veterans (including a two star general), you and me -- we all "operate and thrive on the fringe."

Update: United States Justice Foundation lawsuit. They issued subpeonas to Occidental College to obtain Obama's school and housing records. Of course, Occidental College is fighting hard. The hearing on Occidental's Motion to Quash is March 13, 2009. Documents here and here.

The dirty world of politics

Last week, someone sent me a link to a web site that supposedly belongs to 1Lt. Scott Easterling, the first active duty solider in Iraq to sign on to become a plaintiff in Dr. Orly Taitz's next lawsuit. After visiting the site (this is the first page) and seeing the nasty language, racism and conduct unbecoming an officer, I contacted Orly right away. She sent back: 1Lt Scott Easterling does not have a blog and the one currently up is not Scott's. Someone is impersonating him and that is a crime.

New posts have been added by this impostor which include this one dated February 28, 2009:

Vatican to Purchase Micro Effect Radio

ROME – "US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Monday urged Pope Benedict XVI to negotiate buying The Micro Effect as she wrapped up her first overseas trip, during which she agreed to work closely with the Pontiff on the UHURU fears of several African nations.

"The Micro Effect is a powerful underground Internet-based radio network. Some militant hosts have been hearing callers demand for everything from UFO parking meters to a gold-plated guillotine for American Congressmen. Unfortunately some listeners have been digging deeper into rap lyrics, YouTube videos and dusty internet posts. The activity has put a wrench into the planned genocide of white Americans. If the Vatican can buyout The Micro Effect staff, then the only refuge for Zyprexa-deprived thinkers is Plains Radio. Lt. Scott Easterling, a fictional creation of Jedediah Bartman, is the undercover spy that suggested a Mormon link to Operation Purse Head. Yes, I said Purse Head. But wait. Oh, never mind. That'll be in tomorrow's post."

Of the thousands of radio stations/networks who broadcast on the Internet and/or satellite, why would this impostor single out the Micro Effect Radio Broadcasting Network? My radio show airs five nights a week on that network and last week I spent a considerable amount of time on the Obama citizenship fraud. It seems remote that is the reason other than the timing of the Micro Effect posting. However, the fact remains that who ever is running this blog is doing it to discredit 1Lt Scott Easterling and makes anyone who supports his honorable actions appear to be loons. Orly is investigating and I believe we will see legal action very soon. As to who is behind it, my bet is Obama's vile political operative, David Axlerod.

The link on that site in which the impostor identifies himself has now been sanitized. As a matter of fact, when I started this column, the three pages (older posts up to newer posts) have all been sanitized! Too late. Orly (and I) have captured the previous posts and she is going after this impostor. Obama's fanatics or paid operatives will go to any lengths now that the wall of lies is crumbling.

On January 27, 2009, I personally delivered a file to Richard Durbin, Chief US Attorney for the North-Western District of TX for Criminal Matters in Austin, Texas; about a six hour drive from my home. As he was unavailable to a peasant like me, my package was accepted and I was assured it would be put right on his desk. An exact duplicate will be mailed to Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago today. In my cover letter to Mr. Durbin I said, in part:

"Last month you had an unscheduled meeting with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., from the State of California. This was in regards to a case of hers, Brockhausen v Andrade. Dr. Taitz is one of several attorneys with cases dealing with the Obama citizenship issue.

"Back in October, I forwarded my complaint to James Burrus, Chief Election Fraud Investigator in Washington, DC. My request was simple: I want Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham, investigated for violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, wire fraud, for starters.

"I belong to no political party. I did not vote for McCain or Obama because neither of them are constitutionally eligible. Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka and so forth, is not and can never be a ‘natural born citizen at birth’ due to his father's citizenship. His father was a Kenyan citizen under the British. This is a proven fact. Obama has stated as much. The problem is most people don't understand ‘natural born at birth.’

"There are more than 40 state and federal cases; some still active. Not a single case docketed by the U.S. Supreme Court has been heard. All denied. Not on merit, but politics."

In that file (the legal kind with several internal folders), I included the items you see on this Index. All of the documents are self explanatory and some will link over to the FOIA requests section. The one you might not be familiar with is item two: Letter from Jesse Trentadue to Sen. Patrick Leahy. Read it. Eric Holder is Durbin's boss. Obama chose Holder because he is dirty and corrupt as they come. Shame on the ethically bankrupt U.S. Senate for confirming Holder. He should never, ever have been confirmed as America's top cop. He is going down, just like Obama. Mark my words. It's just a matter of time. Millions of Americans are fed up with crooks, liars and those who believe they are above the law serving in high levels of OUR government.

This is a dicey situation for Durbin and others inside the Department of Justice. Holder is their boss and the usurper president can fire all of them at his whim. There are good, decent people who do work for DOJ. Yes, there are bad ones (primarily in the income tax division), but don't under estimate how many truly loyal Americans work for some of these agencies.

We must all make our voices heard. I would ask you to please take a few minutes and send Mr. Durbin a snail mail letter. I politely informed Durbin that this is NOT going away. In your letter to Durbin you can simply cite my visit, the date and that you also respectfully request Barack Hussein Obama aka whatever his real name is, be investigated for violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, wire fraud.

In your letter to Durbin, just add some bullet points:

- Obama has a team of lawyers who have spent between $800,000 and $1,000,000 to keep his vault certificate showing his birth place sealed. Why on earth would anyone do such a thing?

- Even if Obama were born in Hawaii and there is NO proof he was, that still does not make him constitutionally eligible. His father's citizenship is the concrete reason why Obama can never be constitutionally eligible.

- Several members of Congress tried to legislate his citizenship last year. It didn't work. You cannot amend the U.S. Constitution with a resolution.

- Do you know the State of Illinois Election Board says they have no paperwork on Obama when he ran for the Illinois State Senate? How can that be? What is there to hide?

- Why did Obama aka Soetoro lie on his Illinois Bar Application when he said he has never used any other name but Barack Hussein Obama when we know that is a provable lie?

- Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth has always known he was not eligible to run and he did anyway. He has committed fraud and used his campaign to unlawfully raise over $600 million dollars both on radio and television. No one is above the law.

In my cover letter to Durbin, I pointed out Obama's closed door meeting with Chief Justice John Roberts and the fact that Durbin and the other attorneys in his office have been mislead to believe the courts have heard all these cases and dismissed them on merit. If I were Durbin, I would be curious enough to play the CD in my car and listen to it on the way home. We shall see.

Mail to: Richard Durbin, Chief US Attorney for the North-Western District of TX for Criminal Matters, 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1000, Austin, Texas 78701

Anyone who thinks all that we've been doing is a waste of time is a waste of time. Had I not read the works of Bill Benson, Larry Becraft, Edwin Vieira and dozens more way back beginning in 1991 and then gone on to write my Bankrupt America booklet, how many Americans would know the truth about the FED? My work played a small part and those who got the truth then told others. What if people like Bill Still didn't "waste his time" by putting out his magnificent work, The Money Masters? What if John and Sharon Voss had not put out their accurate and informative newsletters for so many years explaining the theft going on in areas like the FED and IRS? The list of Americans making a difference is very extensive. If none of us tried, we would lose by default.

It is millions of Americans putting their time and efforts into bringing the truth to our fellow Americans that has brought us so far the past decade. Now we MUST keep the pressure on and not let up. It took me 12 hours to drive to and from Austin to deliver a comprehensive package to DOJ. It will only take you a few minutes to type a quick letter and mail it off to Durbin. Together, our voices will be heard.

These are dangerous and unsettling times. The financial collapse continues and with it will come even more unrest and anger by tens of millions of Americans. Get your personal survival plan in place. As the situation with Obama's fraud builds so much pressure it can no longer be contained, the situation will be become even more unstable. Empty bellies make for angry mobs. Click here for storable foods. Any negative repercussions will be the fault of Obama and Obama alone for allowing this to continue.

Our cause is noble. The Constitution matters. While it is human nature to be afraid, we are warriors and we will not back down.

Upcoming guests on my radio show:

March 4: Former Arizona Sheriff, Richard Mack
March 5: Marilyn Barnwell, author of When the Swan's Neck Breaks

On live radio: Solutions Not Politics
Monday-Friday
6:00 pm PST, 8:00 pm CST and 9:00 pm EST
Click here to Listen live:

Links:

1 - Statements by military officers who will be plaintiffs in the Obama citizenship crisis
2 - Clinton supporters sharing evidence for RICO case against Obama campaign
3 - Lawsuit to remove Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State
4 - Hillary Clinton leads top ten corrupt public officials
5 - California used to check prez candidates' eligibility
6 - Communists: Obama 'best opportunity in decades'

1 - Committees of Safety
2 - Truth Attack.org
3 - STOP Sustainable Development

1 - To Beat Recession, Indies Launch Buy-Local Push: "An analysis he did last year found that a 10% shift in spending to local businesses in Grand Rapids, Mich., could create 1,600 jobs with a payroll of $53 million."
2 - Domestic products meet all your needs
3 - Buy Made in America. Create jobs, open more factories here in America.

© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization.

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site (www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her web site. It is filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources.

E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd434.htm