HEGELIAN DIALECTIC, PANDEMIC & CREATIVE DESTRUCTION

 

By Nancy Levant
August 7, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Creative Destruction

Creative Destruction is not a new concept. It is, however, a new-age term for the Hegelian Dialectic. Call it what you want, the global results are the same.

In order to achieve one-world governance, existing systems all over the globe had to be dismantled and eliminated. For instance, national sovereignty, national loyalty, national patriotism, personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities versus socially engineered "communities" had to be dismantled, eliminated, and redefined by think tankers financed by philanthropic and government money.

In order to achieve such a tremendous undertaking, money (specifically wages) had to be strategically controlled. Hence, the wildly successful America had to eliminate its jobs. Jobs = wages. Wages = personally selected lifestyles, individual beliefs and preferences, and naturally occurring communities.

Next, the one-world think tankers told us that love of country and specifically patriotism led to "ethnic" battles, conflicts, and domestic terrorism. They also told us that the political expression of and belief in individual freedom was the religious concept of chronically stupid and terrorist-leaning radicals. Keeping in mind that America always accepted immigrants from every country - immigrants and their religious beliefs - the wealthy think tankers decided to incorporate illegal immigration in order that America could be far more "multicultural" and at the same time elevate "racism" to new definitions and levels.

Multi-million illegal immigrants + multi-million jobs eliminated + multi-million nationals losing jobs and homes = a new and improved recipe for racism. Why, you ask? 

The reasons why are obvious: 

1) People are blamers by nature, 

2) "race cards" have always been political manipulators and weapons for all kinds of people and agendas, and 

3) all people are more comfortable around life-kinds, which is exactly why the world is divided up into like-kind regions. It is called human nature.

In the natural world, it is called biology. However, in the world of social engineering on a global scale, it is called the collection of private property, individual freedom, privately owned guns, personal opinions, and middle class wages. It is called the assured collecting of global wealth and natural resources from the world's people. It is called socially engineered theft on a highly professional scale. The wealthy think tankers and the Caucasian powers behind them claim they stand for fairness and equity for the rabble work forces of the world. However, the world remains embroiled in non-stop wars, genocides, death by unusual disease and unnecessary hunger, and growing poverty--except for the world's top and constant one or two percent.

Creative Destruction commands the slow death of nature. In order to achieve the global collection of private property under corporate global governance, nature had to become terminally ill, so we were told, by the merciless treatment of the land-owning rabble. However, before we the rabble were told of our merciless treatment of nature, hundreds of millions of acres all over the world were locked down, without our knowledge, in the form of Biosphere Reserves, conservation corridors, and World Heritage Sites. (To this day, ask your neighbors about Biosphere Reserves. They've never heard of them).

Add to these hundreds of millions of acres every individual burg's watershed systems, state, local, and Federal parks, all the "governed" wetlands, not to mention 90% of the American West and 95% of the State of Alaska and the "international territories" of the Great Lakes "region," Cascadian "region," and the now infamous Southwestern International Border "region" where America's first Third World guerilla war between international drug cartels is currently taking place as the Creative Destruction mechanism for assisting the United Nations to eliminate the Second Amendment. Isn't it amazing to watch America become a Third World loser nation by Creative Destructive design?

Who would have thought it, and it took a bunch of Ivy Leaguers to come up with this extraordinary plan to enrich themselves through financial service to their billionaire masters. 

You go, boys and girls!

Creative Destruction is actually an excellent oxymoron - certainly one of the top ten best of all time - but it is still and only the Hegelian Dialectic. For me, it is sad to think of those who could have stood for and funded truth. Imagine what could have happened if the world's criminal governing cartels would have been exposed by their many insiders, flunkies, prostitutes, and the few who surely understood The Plan in action. Specifically, think of America's wealth in Hollywood, for instance, or in the music or publishing businesses. Think of the many people who were blessed with great success in this country. How sad that not one person came forward to champion freedom from criminal governing cartels and elite thieves. How sad that they ran with the pack to protect themselves instead of championing truth and actual freedom for the world's people. How sad that we are crushed over and over and over again by the mind and heart-numbing sin of greed. How sad that wealth-based arrogance leads to the fear of humanity, which always leads to inhumanity.

As we walk ourselves straight into another dark period of human history, freedom will disappear from our consciousness as we experience the Creative Destruction of the potential for global human freedom. Once the best government that the world ever produced is forgotten, and the last generation of Constitution-understanding people is gone, Socialism/Fascism/Communism, or as the wealthy think tankers like to call it - Communitarianism - will once again try to repress the world's masses by reducing them to useful (translation: lowly paid) laborers for the sole advantage of the world's one percent.

This we call democracy.

Creative Destruction has produced world democracy. And this is why America now hires and operates a homeland paramilitary consisting of international forces - a new system which holds practice drills in our cities and rural areas in case of, what?...who knows? Ask the wealthy think tankers. My guess is the much advertised pandemic, which will make triple billionaires of even more pharmaceutical corporations while ensuring the democracy of massive global depopulation goals. At any rate, I'm sure the paramilitary connection is thoroughly mapped out as that reality continues to internationalize its growing forces.

It is also important to understand that Creative Destruction works in unexpected ways. For example, you will find this article disturbing:

Couple this article with current military plans to assist FEMA with new and forthcoming quarantine laws, and the plot sickens. Just realize that something is afoot in this new nation of ours, and all is seemingly planned. 

There should be nothing as frightening to you as 

1) a seemingly planned pandemic, 

2) a new homeland paramilitary for American civilians, 

3) forcing vaccines into your bodies, and 

4) plans to force-quarantine (translation: imprison) American people for being sick with a designer virus.

Creative Destruction? I would say so.

Please join Darren Weeks and myself every Saturday morning on the Republic Broadcasting Network's Govern America talk show every Saturday morning 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M., Eastern Standard Time. Bring your knowledge, research, and opinions to the people. Please join us. Click here to listen live.

If you haven't read my book, I recommend it, as well. To order The Cultural Devastation of American Women by Nancy Levant, click here.

© 2009 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserve

Nancy Levant is a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American culture. She is the author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful timing).

She is an opponent of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance by deception, political feminism, the public school system, political economics based upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality. To book an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to: Not available

http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy137.htm

THE SCIENCE OF THE U.N.

Be very careful of the so called "experts" to which legitimacy and power are given...and while agree with this article for the most part, I totally reject this authors call for expansion of nuclear energy, whose detriments far outweigh any benefits... if there are any at all. The White Rose Resistance and nonuke.org

by Arthur Robinson June 21, 2008 NewsWithViews.com

A peculiar and dangerous virus is currently infecting American public discourse. This virus pathologically transforms our language, so that our conversations with one another become garbled, confused, and ultimately meaningless. Words are transformed into something they never were intended to mean, or robbed of their meaning altogether. “Democracy” is set to the meaning of “republic,” “gambling” becomes “investment,” and “vice” becomes the “virtue of diversity.”

“Science” -- to which I have devoted my life -- is one of the most devalued words. And nowhere is it more abused than in the United Nations, where institutionalized mob rule is called “science.”

In its headlong drive to gain the power to tax and ration world energy (and thereby control world technology -- sharing taxation authority with other governments in return for their support) the United Nations has created a “process,” which it calls “science.” Yet, this process is different from and, in fact, alien to science as the world has heretofore known it.

The United Nations has selected 600 willing people with formal educations in science to participate in its series of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) meetings and studies. A few hundred other such people -- not quite so fortunate as to be in the select 600 -- also participate in these meetings. Some of these people are actively engaged in scientific work. Others once did so, but are now largely retired. The primary requirement for selection is a willingness to participate in the United Nations’ new “process” and the agenda behind it.

During United Nations IPCC meetings -- large and small -- these people study and discuss the current and past research literature concerning climate and climate prediction, with special emphasis on the entirely unsolved problem of climate prediction for time periods decades and even centuries in the future. In addition to discussions, the participants create written accounts of their deliberations. These emanations are closely observed by a very select small group of United Nations operatives.

When the meetings and writing are completed, this small group of observers combines the products of the meeting into a large important-looking report -- carefully editing the report so that it supports United Nations political objectives. At no time is this report submitted to the 600 plus “scientists” and like-number of non-scientists who participated in the meeting for their final approval. The report and its shorter summary report are disseminated to the public as “settled science,” regardless of the fact that the scientists involved do not agree upon the text. After all, scientists seem never to agree. But the elite few who oversaw the meeting and interpreted its results are special. They are the UN’s anointed messengers of the truth.

This “process” looks like “science.” After all, scientists usually have academic degrees in science; scientists often have meetings to discuss research; scientists write lots of reports; and scientific meetings usually have small groups of scientists who organize the meetings and sometimes summarize the activities. But there is an enormous difference.

Scientific truths are never determined through such meetings; unsolved scientific questions are never resolved by such meetings; and scientific articles are never published unless every putative or listed author has personally approved every word of the publication.

Science has always progressed on the basis of observations, experiments, and thoughts published by individual scientists and sometimes pairs or small groups of scientific coworkers. In the early centuries of science, this publication was largely in the form of personal letters and occasional books. Now, there are thousands of scientific journals in which scientific work is published.

A few of these published articles are especially valuable; a greater number, while not remarkable, provide relative mundane studies that add to the infrastructure of science; many are not useful at all; and some are completely wrong. As individual scientists read these articles, they use their own wisdom, knowledge, and judgment to separate new information that they find valuable from information that they find of no use.

Those who make good choices from the scientific literature and who conduct valuable work themselves push forward the frontiers of scientific knowledge. Others do not. There is an etiquette established by custom and culture in science. Those whose articles are judged of little or no value -- and therefore are rarely referenced by other scientists -- are treated with courtesy. Even the best scientists only occasionally produce seminal work and, moreover, it is always possible that the prevailing wisdom is wrong -- that an article which appears to be without value is in fact an unrecognized important new discovery.

Sometimes this process is fast because a new seminal discovery is made. Sometimes it is slow. Always, scientific progress is a result of a large number of individual decisions that trend in a specific direction. Scientific truth is never decided by meetings organized to decide which ideas are true and which are false.

If the mob rule process of the United Nations worked, many great unsolved scientific questions could be quickly solved. United Nations observers could attend scientific meetings of cancer scientists and determined the causes and cures of cancer. With the “science settled,” this scourge could be eliminated. Likewise Alzheimer’s disease, human aging, the origin of the universe, and other great unsolved problems could be solved. The fact is that mob rule does not work in science any better than it works in nations. No scientific question has ever been resolved in this way.

In the present case in which United Nations apparatchiks have proclaimed that human activity is catastrophically warming the planet, the human cost of error is so great than many other scientists have become motivated to individually examine the evidence. Now, a total of more than 9,000 Americans with PhDs in science and therefore professional educational credentials that, on average, equal or surpass the United Nations 600 -- and a total of more than 31,000 Americans with at least BS degrees in science have signed a petition to the U.S. government specifically rejecting the United Nations claim that human use of hydrocarbon energy is injuring the climate. In fact, the 31,000 scientists state that carbon dioxide released by energy production is actually beneficial to the environment. See www.petitionproject.org.

These are 31,000 individual scientific evaluations. Each scientist actually signed his name and approved the conclusion -- unlike the key 600 United Nations participants who did not sign the U.N. report. Even if, however, the 31,000 had met and led each other to participate -- which they did not and even if the U.N. 600 had signed the UN report which they did not, the vote is 50 to 1, or 15 to 1 if we count only PhDs. Scientific truth is not determined by vote, but if the UN likes to vote, this way does not work for them either.

It is time to kill this counterproductive virus that has sickened American science and engineering, and get on with the job of expanding the American hydrocarbon and nuclear energy industries. To do less poses a terrible risk to America’s prosperity and to her future.

This article first appeared in Human Events on 6-17-08

© 2008 - Art Robinson - All Rights Reserve

---

Art Robinson was educated in chemistry at the California Institute of Technology and the University of California at San Diego. Immediately after graduation, he was appointed to the faculty of UCSD and carried out research there and at Stanford University. In 1973, Linus Pauling and Art Robinson founded a research Institute that was known as the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine. Robinson was President and Director of that Institute. In 1980, Art Robinson, his scientist wife Laurelee, and several colleagues founded the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, where he is currently President and Research Professor.

Website: OISM.org

E-Mail: art@oism.org

http://www.newswithviews.com/Robinson/art5.htm