Natural News Store

Showing posts with label Roche. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roche. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2009

BRAVE OXFORD RESEARCHERS SAY TAMIFLU IS NOT FOR KIDS

 
By Byron J. Richards, CCN
August 16, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Governments trying to Push Toxic Drugs for the Flu onto Children

Governments in the United States and Great Britain plan to use antiviral drugs as a first line of defense against the Swine Flu (along with experimental vaccines as they become available), especially in at risk groups such as young children. A new study by Oxford researchers published in the British Medical Journal questions the wisdom of this advice and points out that the risks are likely to outweigh the very slight benefits. (See full study and related commentary). It is worth noting that this is a conflict between government unelected bureaucrats in charge of “herd control” and doctors trying to evaluate the best interests of patients. Unfortunately, public health is never in the best interest of any one patient, and expects collateral damage. And what if that collateral damage is your child?

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of anti-viral drugs, Tamiflu and Relenza, on children under 12 was conducted to determine their safety and effectiveness in treating children with flu and in the ability of these drugs to prevent children from getting the flu.

The drugs were found to reduce the duration of the flu by a day, yet not to reduce the complications of the flu such as fewer asthma problems in children with existing asthma or the need to use antibiotics to treat secondary ear infections arising as part of the flu illness process. This data alone suggests any benefits are very weak and offer far less protection than basic nutrients that have no adverse effects such as vitamin Dvitamin Czinc, andacidophilus.

In the preventive sense, a full level treatment dose needs to be given to 13 children simply to prevent one case of the flu – again a very weak result.

On the other hand, 1 in 20 children develop nausea and vomiting from these drugs, which not only could be mistaken for flu symptoms but can cause life-threatening dehydration in any child who gets the flu as well. For such little benefit, public health officials are willing to expose millions of children to potentially serious and life-threatening medical “prevention” treatment.

Part of the reason for the use of Tamiflu is that a massive government stockpiles of these drugs that occurred in preparation for the bird flu that never came are about to expire. During 2006 the U.S. government received at various points in the year 20 million doses of Tamiflu at a cost of 2 billion dollars. The product has a three year shelf life, though I would wonder a little bit about how good it is that close to expiration.

Regardless, Tamiflu will only work, if it works at all, on the first wave of individuals taking it. After that, the Swine flu will mutate around it. This resistance to Tamiflu or other anti-viral drugs will occur relatively quickly.

It should be pointed out that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a warning label to Tamiflu back in November of 2006, based on numerous reports of delirium and suicide mostly in children under 17.

Side effects occurred within 24-48 hours of taking the drug and included panic attacks, delusions, delirium, convulsions, depression, loss of consciousness, and even suicide.

Back in 2006 the FDA said “We are concerned that when/if the use of this drug increases in the U.S. … there may be increasing cases of adverse consequence in the U.S.” That time appears to be now – and as typical the FDA is silent when public health is in danger (except they are busy attacking dietary supplement companies trying to help people).

The revised FDA warning states, “People with the flu, particularly children, may be at an increased risk of self-injury and confusion shortly after taking Tamiflu and should be closely monitored for signs of unusual behavior.”

That is a very weak warning considering that three normal children jumped/fell to their death after taking the drug – one even leaving a suicide note. Other children were struck with psychosis, delusions, and paranoia – all in formerly normal children.

These mental health side effects were not part of the Oxford research, which simply pointed out that the drugs have very little value in the first place and carry serious health risks for an unacceptably large percentage of children likely to take them.

Sign up for Byron’s free e-newsletter and be in the know.
© 2009 Wellness Resources, Inc. - All Rights Reserved

Byron J. Richards, Board-Certified Clinical Nutritionist, nationally-renowned nutrition expert, and founder of Wellness Resources is a leader in advocating the value of dietary supplements as a vital tool to maintain health. He is an outspoken critic of government and Big Pharma efforts to deny access to natural health products and has written extensively on the life-shortening and health-damaging failures of thesickness industry.
His 25 years of clinical experience from the front lines of nutrition have made him a popular radio guest who callers find impossible to stump. He has personally developed 75 unique nutraceutical-grade nutritional supplement formulas with a focus on thyroid nutrition, healthy weight loss supplements,cardiovascular nutrition, and stress management.
FREE Subscription to Byron's Health Newsletter, click here.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

IS THE FLYING NUN ON CRASH AND BURN COURSE WITH BONIVA?

By Shane Ellison M. Sc.
The People's Chemist
February 15, 2009

NewsWithViews.com

Pharmaceutical companies were freed from restrictions on marketing drugs directly to the consumer in the latter part of the nineties. Since then, an endless procession of C-list celebrities has come forward to give pharmaceutical endorsements.

Starting around 1998 with Joan Lunden pitching Schering-Plough Corp.'s Claritin, it went on to figure skater Dorothy Hamill’s freestyle promotion of Merck's deadly Vioxx, then to Folksinger Shawn Colvin singing the praises of GlaxoSmithKline's anti-depression medication Wellbutrin. Then Bob Dole assured us that “the surge was working” in his commercials for Pfizer's erection pill Viagra.

And today, Big Pharma is getting action from some unexpected actors like a lovable, 62 year old actress who over the years has gained the public’s trust and affection with Smokey and the Bandit, the sitcom series Gidget, and best-known in her television role, as Sister Bertrille in The Flying Nun. Unfortunately, she’s betrayed that trust by signing on to a pharmaceutical endorsement in her promotion of Boniva – the bone shattering drug disguised as an osteoporosis med, marketed by Roche and Glaxo.

Boniva is technically known as a “bisphosphonate.” You don’t need to worry about pronouncing it. But you do need to know that these toxins were originally used to clean up calcium deposits in boiler pipes, and an “accidental” discovery led to their clinical use. I couldn't make this stuff up.

Witnessing that the cleaning agent was a “calcium magnet,” someone hell-bent on profit – probably a drug-sales rep – figured that it might be good for getting calcium into bone, thereby making them stronger. So they started feeding it to people – after a rubber stamp FDA drug approval, of course.

The medical community has since discovered that Boniva severely inhibits the body’s ability to discard old bone. “Caution: Doctor thinking…”

Physicians interpreted this action as leading to stronger bones. “Heck, if the skeleton isn’t discarding old bone, then this here drug must help strengthen the bone.” Their thought process was flawed from the start. This is akin to trying to keep a person’s stomach full by putting a cork in their butt.

Once Boniva is melded into the skeletal system, it does in fact interfere with the shedding of old dead bone. Rather than “die off,” old, weak bones cells stick around. This prevents the growth of new bone cells, thereby causing the rest of the skeletal system to become weak. Duh!

The net result of taking Boniva is that you become a sack of old bones, held up by a crusty skeleton which is actually becoming more and more fragile over time, the exact opposite of what Sally’s anti-osteoporosis commercial implies.

Even The New York Times took notice. In their article, "Drugs to Build Bones May Weaken Them," they state that Boniva users, “show a rare type of leg fracture that shears straight across the upper thighbone after little or no trauma. Fractures in this sturdy part of the bone typically result from car accidents, or in the elderly and frail. But the case reports show the unusual fracture pattern in people who have used bone-building drugs called bisphosphonates for five years or more.”

As they say on the late night infomercials; “But wait, that’s not all!” Boniva has actually given rise to a new disorder – never before seen on planet Earth. The Times tells us that Boniva can cause "jawbones to rot and die!" Physicians are calling this Dead Jaw. This is actually perfect.

In light of the dead Jaw findings, Boniva can now be used for the off-label use of eradicating pharmaceutical's chattering drug reps!

As an added bonus; side effects of Boniva may include - severe and occasionally incapacitating bone, joint and/or muscle pain, eye redness and/or tenderness, heavy jaw feeling, loosening of a tooth, pain, swelling, or numbness in the mouth or jaw, sensitivity to light, severe eye pain, tearing, bladder pain, chest pain, bloody or cloudy urine,…the list goes on. I’m just tired of typing…

So what’s the alternative to anti-osteoporosis drugs?

First, say no to drugs. Then start taking cod liver oil to boost Vitamin D levels and calcium absorption. If you’re carrying around excess weight, give your skeletal system a break, lose the excess fat.

The Flying Nun is losing airspeed and I predict she will stall and spin in – going the way of that creepy Jarvik dude. Lawsuits against the maker of Boniva are on the rise and negative user testimonials are appearing by the thousands on the internet.

I hereby proudly give a “Stinky Sulfur Award” to Sally Field for “boning up” to the challenge of squandering her public trust and bringing misinformation, deception, and suffering to millions (in exchange for a fat check from Roche/Glaxo).

Author's Note

Ellison's entire career has been dedicated to the study of molecules; how they give life and how they take from it. He was a two-time recipient of the prestigious Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Grant for his research in biochemistry and physiology. He is a bestselling author, holds a master's degree in organic chemistry and has first-hand experience in drug design. Use his knowledge and insight to look and feel your best in 90 days with his AM-PM Fat Loss Discovery. Click here to read more.

© 2009 Shane Ellison - All Rights Reserve

Shane Ellison, M.Sc. is an author and organic chemist. He is a two-time recipient of the prestigious Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Grant for his research in biochemistry and physiology. An internationally recognized authority on therapeutic nutrition, he is the founder of The AM-PM Fat Loss Discovery package. At one time, he was TOTALLY against diet pills. Now he is 100% for them! Learn why here.

Learn more about his books Health Myths Exposed and The Hidden Truth about Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs.

Get 6-months of his FREE Life-Saving Health Briefs at www.healthmyths.net.

E-Mail: shane@health-fx.net

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ellison/shane147.htm